I think my approach is “idc if a couple companies are slightly less bad than all the others. Companies by nature are driven to exploit people and resources in order to increase profits. Individuals can vary, but by and large that is the incentive of the system. Most of the products everyone relies on from day to day are completely unethical, and the “more ethical” ones are more expensive and only people who benefit from this exploitative system can afford them and do to feel better.”

I have no evidence to the contrary.

Btw it’s been settled. Below, I showed the alts and one admitted to being the same.

https://burkina24.com/

They’re an alt of cyberghost, and I tend to ignore the questions bc they’re boring.

I also know because they post most of the stuff from the accounts on matrix. Assuming their honesty, they’re just a terminally online dude with multiple lemmygrad accounts and way more Reddit alts lol. Yes, I find the way they engage online annoying. I don’t know if it’s suspicious.

Me in 2007: “in 2009 [x financial company] will be on top of the market, right?” 🤞

I too’ve tried to help them think dialectically and read relevant theory. Good luck.

I get why you have that stance, but I don’t know if it’s applicable everywhere.

I think it’s good to draw religious people in and not tell them socialism is only for atheists? Still the full context quote is kinda cringe.

I am absolutely shit at songwriting (due to inexperience)

Ditto. That’s why I just want to use good quotes.