I’m in this picture and don’t like this

But the peril is highest in those first few levels as a strong breeze will kill a level 1 character. I also think it is hard to get a feel for a character if they lack eveything that defines them class-wise imo

Ah yes, secondary and tertiary effects of climate change claps

We don’t need a plan where we’re going!

Well, you DID say you had a character idea…

I’d never recommend playing dnd 5e at level 1, even for beginners. Level 3 is where classes get their basic identity and you don’t instantly die to everything

But what if you did it thrice!

It’s kind of pathetic they don’t even pretend to care about their own rules anymore.

I just hope we can turn this place into a better alternative!

Ama related; What’s the thing your players did that caused the biggest “Oh. NO. They did that?!” reaction you’ve had

That would disqualify a lot of the better quality sources and promote low quality clickbait.

I’d much prefer either a paywall bypass, such as archive, in the body or comments. Alternatively a copy of the full text / high quality summary needs to be provided. The rules as provided would for instance disqualify reuters and several investigative journalist papers.

I also think posters who use a non standard source (ie not the well known reuters/ap/bbc/cnn/aljazeera etc) should mention in the text the reach and slant of the source.

Pretty decent article ezplaining why