Anais Rim
#Writer | #Vulgarian | #Pervert
Hi! I’m Anais Rim. I’m a CIS Heterosexual Male. I’m #SexPositive. A #LGBTQ , #transgender, and #NeuroDivergent ally. I’ve attended #Pride rallies on and off since the 1990s. And I support the rights of #POC and #Indigenous communities.
I’ve been a community #kinkster for decades. I believe grown adults can and should engage in healthy consensual #sex as much as they wish, including safe #kink.
I can edit #text and #video. #Adobe #DavinciResolve #FOSS
Good luck. I run the BDSM groups at LemmyNSFW. If you ever want to post on-topic OC material there, we’d love to have you in our communities.
Thank you for contributing to LemmyNSFW! You got my upvote.
I agree with all of that. To me, the issue is really about how we treat OC contributors. Whether they are amateurs just having fun or OF creators in it for a small buck, they are human beings first. They deserve basic respect. That’s all I want.
Discussion about this in the Mod coordination room is IMO the proximate cause. An older woman posted an image of herself in shibari ropes to a shibari forum and got cruel commentary over her appearance and a mass of downvotes. And that kind of behavior had happened before in gonewild, driving away many good amateur contributors.
I don’t care about removing downvotes. But I do want strong enforcement when it come to the community hurting real people.
I took the trouble to read the report. What in there is deeply flawed?
You might as well argue pouring sugar in your coffee could trigger drug addicts into taking hard drugs again, because white powder.
It’s the same argument. Both are equally ridiculous.
Actual abuse should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. But not because it might have incited someone else to break the law. You need an actual victim, with testimony, to conduct an investigation and a prosecution.
I’m not talking about Ada or that decision specifically, but about why focus on this issue has hit more mainstream sites. This was a right wing attack and smear. But now this report means it will get much more regular press coverage. And that will apply pressure to fediverse admins to prevent it.
The report’s conclusion that admins must centralize some mod capabilities is likely not to be desired by fediverse admins and devs.
OK. But that has nothing to do with this report. Is he listed as one of the authors?
Hey, this Stanford Report on CSAM in the Fediverse might explain why instance admins are nervous about even the appearance of illicit content.
https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:vb515nd6874/20230724-fediverse-csam-report.pdf