Avatar

broface

broface@lemm.ee
Joined
0 posts • 97 comments
Direct message
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
4 points

I’d be happy with the destruction of copyright and patent laws.

permalink
report
reply

Glad Nvidia has seen the writing on the walls and isn’t treating desktop Linux like a second-class citizen.

permalink
report
reply

What’s funny is Java solved an issue that is pretty much non-existent in today’s environment: compatibility.

It’s much less like the Wild West these days. People have a clearer picture of what to support, how to support it, and generic tools to abstract platform-specific code.

I like Java. I think they did good things and had a pragmatic approach to the problems they were trying to solve.

But time goes on, and this young discipline progresses fast. It’ll be interesting to see decades from now what languages survive and which ones don’t.

I predict as time goes on, we’ll get fewer big languages (popular, widespread, useful, etc.) and they will stick around for much longer.

Kind of like human language, if you think about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I don’t really thing the security ‘guarantees’ of rust matter that much.

I think it’s a better language to work in than C or C++, though. That’s not a reason to change utilities now, but a larger Rust ecosystem is always better in my humble opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply

What for?

Personally, I’m a huge fan in unifying software under one language.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I think that’s fair.

Eventually, the Rust-alternatives will be battle-hardened too and we can simply choose what suits us best.

It’s a good time for software, honestly.

permalink
report
parent
reply

This is the cold, sad truth of Linux.

Unfortunately, when a company does not meet your standards, the solution is not to give them your money. Not to lower your standards.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Most big companies have feedback channels for customers on their websites.

What company are you talking about in particular?

permalink
report
reply

someone who doesn’t want to confess can still plead not guilty.

Then they would be contesting the charges. A plea of ‘not guilty’ means you are contesting the charges.

has a completely different function than pleading no contest.

Yes, contesting the charges has a completely different function than not contesting the charges.

You seem to equate a plea of ‘not guilty’ with ‘not confessing.’ This isn’t true. A plea of not guilty means you are contesting the charges.

A plea of ‘no contest’ means you are not contesting the charges, nor are you admitting guilt (confessing.)

Sorry, I’ve explained things as best I can. If you don’t get it now, you never will and I think we should both move on.

permalink
report
parent
reply