doesntmatter [none/use name]

but anyway i call myself a communist that can see extreme value in Leninism, Maoism and any other theory written by communists in the actual struggle and this is what it gives me

https://www.politicalcompass.org/yourpoliticalcompass_js?ec=-9.63&soc=-8.05

firstly for any non-Hexbearians: fuck this. we were never ideologically shut in, we just accurately realised that theres no point having major sectarianism and screaming at eachother in our forum over minor differences at this stage, as it should be when we’ve all ruthlessly criticised the preconceived ideas of the societies most of us have grown up in. noone who stuck around was a halfwitted and properly ideologically shut in liberal or someone who was kidding themselves about being centrist. we didnt let these kind of people pretend they were right or had something valuable in their theoretical outlook on politics, because they/you really probably don’t. if you want to talk about some other specialisation you have or a unique outlook on other things, sure, maybe. politics? philosophical conception of how the world currently is and what the issues are and what might fix them? unless it’s some type of socialism, none of us give a single fuck

anyway thinking of anything in the line of “authoritarian” as a descriptor is accurate means you’ve already lost some communist cred. authoritarianism is made up. noone is truly free in any ideological manifestation of society. it’s simply different levels of coercion. and communism, with its ideals met, is the least coercive system of societal organisation. on the way there will always be practical issues as every AES state has found, with the USSR, NK, Cuba and China for example navigating a siege-like global terrain and implementing cultural change in different ways that have ALL lead so far to the people’s general livelihood improved from what it was before communism. that is absolutely undebatable. under capitialism each of these countries would have had near zero development and their people would still be generally impoverished rather than a steadily developing wellbeing slowly emerging under, again, siege-like global conditions

i already understand them and i dont give a fuck about discussing in an online forum

its performance in terms of being good is absolute shit as well as far as i’m seeing

da physics of the eye is also da same and our brains are all built roughly the same so whateva

i’ll say it this is only true when you’re not as based and theorised as da Empire State Building and can imagine libs and people who think they’re not a lib but totally are know any worthwhile political theory

i dont think you are engaging with the actual thinking going on and instead are being like “but what about the fact that we can never truly know anyone else!!!” it’s easy to understand. light is a phenomena that is pretty well explained in physics and with other “philosophical” or logical evidence. we’re not all seeing different shit even if it’s interesting to think about

the author’s being so lazy about what theyre doing with metaphors so it might look kinda racist but its REALLY NOT GUYS!!! and da cool fucken GENOCIDE is done with so much flair :3

why on gods green earth

just read a comment implying she condemns a Lot of parties - why is she like this ? just ask her why is she like this. there’s no built up movement in the West. there’s no need to keep other far leftists/communists ideologically arguing about things that are so far in the future that no communist line could possibly be predicted to come out on top yet