Avatar

dontgooglefinderscult

dontgooglefinderscult@lemmings.world
Joined
0 posts • 133 comments
Direct message

The racist wine aunt that promised to continue economic policies that hurt the bottom 70% of the US wouldn’t have won.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You people are not owed votes. People vote for things, Harris offered nothing of value. People do not usually vote against things.

Tens of millions of poor Americans are worse off now than they were under Trump during the height of the pandemic. What was the liberal messaging from the Harris campaign?

No you’re not, get over it, vote for more of the same economics that have destroyed your last shred of hope for a brighter future.

That doesn’t resonate with people. Clinton ran a campaign on “I’m not him,” without acknowledging antying americans wete suffering through under Obama. Loss

Biden didn’t run a campaign, but acknowledged people suffering under Trump and under Obama. Win

Harris ran a campaign on “I’m exactly the last guy and I’m not Trump” without acknowledging the people suffering under Biden’s policy, loss

People don’t vote against, they vote for, and if you give them no hope things will get better, why would they vote for you?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Man you bigots have been emboldened lately.

permalink
report
parent
reply

If only he did this in 2016 instead of grovelling at the corporate Dems feet and destroying all credibility he built up by trying to gaslight the left into voting for the opposite of his beliefs three elections in a row.

Between his behavior over the last few years and his spotty support of genocide, I don’t believe he means these words, he simply wants more money before he dies. I suspect another book release soon.

permalink
report
reply

The career politician ran a better campaign and lied more believably.

Also not all union leaders are left wing, paradoxically. There are legitimate reasons that Americans distrust unions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

That’s not possible in the current electoral system. Therefore voting third party needs to happen first.

Or really, the thing we can’t say in the Internet anymore and the thing that you liberals hate more than the thought of losing capitalism itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply

How did treating all dissent as Russian/Chinese bots/trolls work out this election? Not very well. Because they mostly don’t exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Tariffs issued by the US will only harm the US, and so on. The anti China block represents an extreme minority of people in the planet and an ever shrinking percentage of total industry and energy use. More and more countries are choosing brics

permalink
report
parent
reply

There isn’t, is the point of the meme. Until now at least. Politics doesn’t allow general discussion via self posts.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I would disagree, but state at that point a lot of people need to die and it’s time to help other countries to that to your own. If you find yourself in an evil country, for example one where both of its major parties are not arguing over whether to commit genocide, just who the victims should be, and a majority of people vote for either of those two parties, you should be helping the vulnerable flee and working towards preparing the last remaining humans in the country to do what’s necessary for the world to survive.

Hypothetically speaking, of course.

But more to the point, no, democracy lives or dies with its people. If the majority of people vote for evil, said evil should win, so that it may be stamped out.

You do not punish a crime that may happen, you punish those that have planned or carried out a crime. Until one or the other happens it’s just talk, and thus you would be the criminal if you intervened.

permalink
report
parent
reply