Not as of yesterday, no.

And that’s fine, I certainly have no shortage of things to occupy my time, I’d just hoped to be able to help make the SDF even more awesome :)

I’m giving up on this Lemmy FWIW. I signed up over at lemmy.ml

I could be wrong but I think this is a general issue within the SDF. It’s an incredible organization and I value my membership in it very highly but I wish it were easier to pitch in and volunteer to make things better.

I think I’ll give lemmy.ml a shot. It’s run by the Lemmy developers so seems like chances are good it’ll continue to function properly :)

Ah well, we live in an imperfect world. I’m grateful for them in any case! :)

So it’s interesting reading all the folks talking about permacomputing and the like.

And I think there’s merit to keeping those architectures around.

But let’s turn this on its head, shall we? Where do we get the people who still have that hardware who are willing to actively take part in Linux kernel development?

Like, to become facile enough with the process, tools and codebase to be able to bear the load of writing new security patches as vulnerabilities are found?

It’s a hard problem. The number of people actively contributing to Linux is large in aggregate but VANISHINGLY small when it comes to any particular area of interest.

Well, I sent an application email with my resume and the best proposal I could think of to volunteer@ a couple weeks back. We’ll see what happens I guess :)

Ooh thanks for the link that’s super helpful!

I don’t think Pascal is clunky! I think it represents a point on the evolution of programming languages and is still well loved by a LOT of people! Just google Free Pascal or Lazarus Pascal.

The back catalog is amazing too. They’ve interviewed SO MANY amazing luminaries from the Atari’s past and present.

I love how much modern computing culture has its roots in the good old Amiga, and folks who didn’t own one are totally clueless about it.

Perhaps a good opportunity to fix/improve/redo that area? I don’t know if that would be a violation of any community rules.

One could, but I would argue that this idea pre-supposed a very ascetic class of programmer, and that depending on one’s goals in learning how to program, recursion can be a useful concept but saying it should be the one litmus test for any learning platforms seems highly questionable to me.