![User's banner](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemm.ee%2Fapi%2Fv3%2Fimage_proxy%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Flemmy.dbzer0.com%252Fpictrs%252Fimage%252F416eaf7e-ebf0-4f9e-99db-968abb187f91.png&w=2048&q=75)
![Avatar](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemm.ee%2Fapi%2Fv3%2Fimage_proxy%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Flemmy.dbzer0.com%252Fpictrs%252Fimage%252F9d88b998-129f-4e28-a089-02fe7f6297ea.png&w=3840&q=75)
![Avatar](/_next/image?url=%2Flemmy-icon-96x96.webp&w=3840&q=75)
HSR🏴☠️
He/him
Hot high speed rail lines near you.
PM me ur sexy train pics.
Doesn’t read like it to me
40 PRE-SPRINT AND PRE-RACE PARC FERME
40.2 […] the following work may be carried out:
g) Repair of genuine accident damage, defined as any of the following:
iii) Damage incurred whilst off track limits, which also result in significant loss of lap time or a lap time which is deleted by the Race Director.
Could it be floor damage for Verstappen?
Edit: Brundle confirms “significant” floor damage
And yet he didn’t actually build the Hyperloop. Could this mean that Elon, the car salesman, secretly loves traffic???
Whether a 7-year-old sees adult content accidentally, intentionally, because of peer pressure or any other reason, I still think age appropriate sex ed would be helpful. I acknowledge that minors do view inappropriate content and that it is generally unhealthy, but since it can happen, and does happen, a good approach would be to educate them preemptively.
For example, these guildelines for sex ed in EU, which caused some outrage in conservative circles a few years back, suggest that “sex in media and dealing with it” is a topic for 6 to 9-year-olds.
Of course you can’t cover every outlier, but can you really stop 5th graders from sending weird shit to their friends because they’re trying to be edgy?
Edit:
Another way to think about it:
- Was the content accessed accidentally? If so, I would argue this law misses the point and better moderation would be more effective and also less, y’know, surveillance state adjacent
- Was the content accessed intentionally? In this case, sex ed would probably help
“When we evaluate how minors interact with the internet, for 90% of them it is their first way of getting to know about sexuality. From there, 50% of them recognise that they generate imitation and even with approaches that have domination as a central element. There is an enormous distortion in the way they are going to develop their sexuality”, she stressed. [via DeepL, emphasis mine]
Hmmmmm, if only there was a way to educate minors about sexuality before they ultimately turn to internet because adults just ignore the problem.
Edit:
Incibe is also collaborating, which is checking that browsers “control access based on URLs” to prevent access to minors. Cabanillas said that “a black list” of browsers that do not do so will be created.
It’s a miracle politicians aren’t targeted by scammers more frequently, given they have no idea how internet works.
I imagine any reasonable traffic law would forbid drivers from impeding traffic like that. You might be able to do it somewhat discreetly, but it’s still a matter of enforcement, and you can bet blue nonces will suddenly start caring about enforcing traffic laws.
Edit: UK Road Traffic Act
If a person drives a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other persons using the road or place, he is guilty of an offence.
Even more interesting that land use had a marginal cooling effect, despite also causing a net increase in CO2 emissions.