True, except the rises so far have been much larger than inflation warrants, with the expectation for a correction at some point, which is what the article discusses.

Oh, it’s a TLDR of the article, not my opinion.

The grocery stores record profits make it obvious they have more than enough room to absorb a lot of the upstream pressure for price increases. They don’t feel compelled to do so in any way though :/

Fixed the link

Fixed the link

Still learning how to post on Lemmy sorry about that, fixed the link to the model.

Not funny :/

Working as intended then.

Some trans support rallies in BC tomorrow:

https://bcfed.ca/statement/no-space-for-trans-hate

That’s a logical fallacy. Given A is B it does not follow that B is A.

edit: it would make sense if it was phrased as “A is equivalent to B”. Saying “A is B” in a scientific context has a very specific meaning. Makes me wonder how trustworthy the paper itself is.

Looks like the findings are specifically about out-of-context learning, i.e. fine-tuning on facts like “Tom Cruise’s mother was Mary Lee Pfeiffer” is not enough to be able to answer a questions like “Who are the children of Mary Lee Pfeiffer?”, without any prompt engineering/tuning.

However, if you have in the context something like “Who was Tom Cruise’s mother?”, then the LLM has no problem answering correctly “Who are the children of Mary Lee Pfeiffer?”, listing all the children, including Tom Cruise.

Note that it would be confusing even to a human to ask “Who is the son of Mary Lee Pfeiffer?”, which is what they test on, since the lady had more than one son. That was the point of my comment, it’s just a misleading question.

But that’s not the issue in general that the researchers have unearthed, as I assumed based on the “A is B” summary, so yeah, it’s just a poor choice of wording.