No, because one transaction uses as much energy as a normal household in a year. Or something like that.

Both based on Bing’s search engine

Het doet bijna denken aan de Chinese Culturele Revolutie. Kranten, boeken, theater en musea gaan omhoog in BTW-tarief want intellectuele hobby’s. Tokkiehobbies zoals bioscopen en pretparken niet. (Ik hou ook van tokkiehobbies hoor.)

https://archive.ph/T0hFN#0%25

Hier is nog een kopie

Dankje! Ik heb de link inmiddels geüpdatet, nu is de opmaak van de originele pagina behouden.

Initial distribution was through a captcha-protected crypto ‘faucet’. The faucet is still up. Did the developers keep a large part of the coins themselves? I’ve never heard that.

No, because I’m not a trader. It’s not all about the exchange rate for me, but about the utility of the coin.

Most coins exist because other coins exist. Nano and Monero not necessarily.

I like it as a way to donate to creators without revealing my identity. It comes close to handing over cash.

You could also use it to pay for a VPN, but since the VPN provider sees your original IP address anyways, I don’t think that’s useful.

I only like two cryptocurrencies.

Nano: free transactions, each wallet runs it’s own blockchain, so it’s got no negative impact on the environment.

Monero: allows for anonymous transfers

https://archive.ph en https://ghostarchive.org hebben volgens mij niks met archive.org te maken.

Dat klopt, het zijn losse initiatieven. Maar beide zijn goede projecten om aan te doneren, als je het mij vraagt.