![Avatar](/_next/image?url=%2Flemmy-icon-96x96.webp&w=3840&q=75)
lambalicious
I write English / Escribo en Español.
Vidya / videojuegos. Internet. Cats / Gatos. Pizza. Nap / Siesta.
This user’s posts under CC-BY-NC-SA license. Ask me if you need a different permission.
I might be old but I seem to recall the French taught the proper way to protest this kind of stuff, rather than the soft protests we saw in 2020, let alone 2016.
As for me, fortunately I live in tbe Best Hemisphere so I plan to offer whatever housing space I have available so my friends from the US can flee over and nap the Trump Kingdom over.
How long do you think copyright should be?
No easy solutions but my general guideline would be that both copyright and patents should never last more than half the retirement age of a current generation, calculated via actuarial tables or some trustable scientific method.
The rationale is simple: the ultimate purpose of both is (or, well, should be) to promote creation so that society in general can be participant of the resulting effects. Half the retirement age not only is a good compromise between giving creator control and giving at least half of society the opportunity to enjoy the public good result of creation within their lifetime and within their fair opportunity to earn wages, in particular in such cases as eg.: big pharma and medications, but also promotes that big creators, such as corporations, act towards the public good of lengthening life and providing good living standards for the rest of society.
And this is the reason I run infra on Debian Stable, or Oldstable, rather than eg.: Sid.