…well they can’t really purge microsoft office…

…when i have a yen for refreshment, i look for the familiar paper sticker that invites me to stop and enjoy the real thing: hecho en méxico…

…your purgatory sounds like a dream sabbatical to me: 100% down for option A, finally an opportunity to do what i want with my life rather than renting it out to FIRE lords for bare survival…

…i mean, you can piano tuna, but the tuna probably won’t appreciate it unless it’s a former-game-show-tycoon-politician…

…you can accomplish your goal by calculating running totals based on 4d6 drop low as you roll, then re-assigning the final score(s) in your array deterministically to hit the 27-point limit per the optional point-buy rule, but you’ll have to extrapolate point costs for high and low rolls not included in the point-buy table to make that work…

3 (-14)
4 (-10)
5 (-7)
6 (-4)
7 (-2)
8 (0)
9 (1)
10 (2)
11 (3)
12 (4)
13 (5)
14 (7)
15 (9)
16 (12)
17 (15)
18 (19)

(personally, i hate point-buy and the algorithmic gameplay it fosters: the base rule - choice of 4d6 drop low or standard array - provides an ideal distribution if players commit to their choice before rolling)

…catastrophically hostile UI + overrun with bots…

Percentage Change in (Homelessness per 10,000 Residents)

100 -
{[2022 Homeless Population/(2022 Total Population/10,000)
/
1997 Homeless Population /(1997 Total Population/10,000)] *100}

…mathematically, it’s identical to the percentage change in homelessness, but published figures are usually homeless per ten thousand residents just to give a more useable number…

…then what do they call shoestring potatoes?..