pc486
San Francisco’s critical mass was successful to the point it almost doesn’t exist anymore (it’s not necessary anymore with better political engagement). I believe it was successful because it:
- started at the same location and time (once a month on a Friday)
- occurred during evening commute hours
- had no formal leadership
- no planned route until just before departure
This combination meant authorities had no ability to shut it down. What office could the raid? How could they bring a lawsuit?
Once a month on a Friday meant it didn’t have to be about your commute. Rather you’d leave work and ride to the start point. It was a protest first and a utility second (though the route did start from the financial center of the city).
Take a look at bike parties if you’re looking more for a community ride. They bring more of a general supportive base than as a protest.
Parking regulations don’t apply to public projects. Strong Towns well documents the problem with parking regulations as they are written and applied in practice. I highly recommend checking it out.
Bike lanes on roads are practically free. For example, when repainting the road after resurfacing maintenance. It doesn’t take more paint to mark out a bike lane than it does for car parking.
Bike infrastructure at its core is a political issue. If you follow cyclist money, you’ll soon find it spent on bicycle advocacy groups. It’s the best bang-for-buck and addresses all the other barriers, like shop owners complaining about the free public parking they’re not paying for.
Critical Mass was so successful in San Francisco that it almost doesn’t exist anymore. These days discussions of bike lanes is more about what kind of lane rather than if bikes should even be allowed on the road.
https://www.kqed.org/news/11941576/the-night-that-changed-san-francisco-cycling-forever