since when do crackers think about garlic (mario doesn’t count)

also, since when do any of then visualize an actual globe and not a fake mercator “map” where europe is thrice the size of china

okay but the only thing you’d be able to grow is lettuce and herbs. It’s nice saving the amount of space those take up I suppose, but it’s not a farming revolution either

Vertical farming is believed to be the future of agriculture because it allows people to grow crops in upright trays and save precious land space for other human activities.

uhhh this sentence is wrong but yea
the least damaging “human activity” on land would be some type of traditional farming, the only thing “less damaging” than that would be letting it return to wilderness, which is not a human activity

I’m voting for biden so that the Ukraine money drain gets more money to drain

heh everything is fine

I remember in 2021 our soil was just better. This year it looks crumbly and like coffee grounds. A lot of Asian jumping worms too, possibly the reason why

why haven’t I found a single white person who can match or exceed my IQ then

Yes I have. The genes don’t bear it out.

Brahmin ideology stems from the Indo-Aryans of Punjab. And thus the prevalence of Indo-Aryan genes and Indo-Aryan paternal markers tells a very important story.

Brahmins across India, even in Tamil Nadu, are very genetically similar, but have very different paternal markers. The ratio of Indo-Aryan paternal markers is much higher in Bengali and other Gangetic Brahmins (72%) than in Gujarati and Tamil Brahmins (27% and 40%). This is despite their actual Indo-Aryan ancestry being the same (20-25% for all Brahmins)

What does this mean? It means that Brahmins in Gujarat were far more meritocratic and less racist, because they allowed intermarriage of foreign men into their ranks. Almost exactly half of their Indo-Aryan ancestry comes from Brahmin women. This also holds, but to a lesser extent, for the general West and South of India.

Meanwhile in Bengal and Uttar Pradesh, the Brahmins were far more racist, and there is much more documented evidence of female infanticide (which still goes on today). The Gangetic belt of India also coincidentally happens to the poorest and most backward area of India.

well he got whiter
isn’t this what they wanted

Their life was so cheap that a Brahmin could kill a dalit for no reason without repercussions. Even if a Brahmin committed mass murder the worst punishment they could get is to get their ponytail shaved.

This is a northern/Gangetic thing

Women also had no existence without men because of Sati.

This is a northwestern thing, and was only practiced by royalty

Caste discrimination in the Dravidian South existed, but was far less severe and had movements against it as far back as 500 AD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhakti_movement

…that’s kinda unforgivable though. Does the CCP really store their wealth in Swiss bank accounts?