High chance that it’s a Python programmer who is really unhappy about having to work in Java, lol

that’s his left leg crossed over his right

It’s real dangerous to look at someone seeking legal representation and take that as an implication of guilt.

Not defending Mr Beast at all, I’m sure there is no shortage of actual evidence of wrongdoing

Probably more of a “Do x, y, and z and we agree not to sue you about it”

wish kamala’s campaign would run some attack ads about how the Republican speaker is refusing to provide hurricane relief to Republican states

Autocomplete suggestion getting “February” wrong is a nice touch

You’re probably right in the first half, but I wouldn’t be too surprised if interactions between voice assistants are special cases that are accounted for by the programmers as a little bit of an Easter egg

1. I don’t intend to victim blame or defend any abusers here; this shit is vile and should not be tolerated, period.

2. From the below, it sounds like it was determined that, despite Omegle’s moderation efforts, Omegle could have done better in areas relating to age verification and matchmaking. So I’m not trying to defend or minimize Omegle’s role either, I don’t know the details of how the site worked but it sounds like this was a problem for a long time:

the judge in A.M.’s case found last July that Omegle’s design was at fault and it was not protected by Section 230: It could have worked to prevent matches between minors and adults before sexual content was even sent, the judge said.

1. However, I really don’t like the choice of phrasing “forced”, and I wonder whether that’s poor paraphrasing or actually taken from the lawsuit.

Her lawsuit, filed in 2021, alleged that she met a man in his thirties on Omegle who forced her to take naked photos and videos over a three-year period. She was just 11 when it began in 2014.

Again, to be clear, not trying to say that the victim should, or even could, have done anything differently. Victim blaming is bad. But how the hell are they saying “forced” to do something by some scumbag over the internet? What kind of conditions does a kid have to be in at home to feel like they can’t turn to their parent/guardian for help in a terrifying situation like that? How is an 11-year-old in 2014 being allowed to get into that situation in the first place, between her parents and her school?

It seems like this victim was failed by every support system she should have been able to rely on. This is so messed up. This is exactly why we need things like sex education and Internet safety education.

I can’t believe this isn’t satire. I hope these incompetent fuckers get sued into bankruptcy

DOJ is really going at it lately.

I can’t wait to hear about the outcome of this litigation in 20-25 years.