Avatar

switchboard_pete

switchboard_pete@fedia.io
Joined
0 posts • 40 comments
Direct message

Again, you’re thinking from a perspective of a market economy which China is not.

no, i’m thinking from the perspective of resources being finite, which they are

also, i don’t think you know what a market economy is. china literally calls itself a market economy

I’m sure that saving countless millions of lives and preventing people from becoming sick and turning into a strain on the healthcare system is actually very good for the economy.

the meme of “countless millions of lives” aside, you making this argument means that you accept that china shifting more to state-capitalism than regular capitalism isn’t intentional, so i’m not sure what point you’re trying to make

permalink
report
parent
reply

The difference being that China is not neoliberal

i’d respond to this paragraph but you really haven’t made a coherent argument past “us bad china good”

At the level of entire countries this logic can break down.

no, because resources are always finite. the resource doesn’t have to be “money”.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It is not, generally speaking, more economically efficient to deindustrialize your own country

china is literally taking money that they could invest in domestic industry and investing it in industry overseas

i guess now you get to explain why they’re doing that if some form of economic efficiency isn’t the answer

The thing they wanted you to see were the statistics, not the guesswork and editorialization from that article.

“don’t look at that bit of the source i just chose to show you” would be an astounding bit of mental gymnastics

permalink
report
parent
reply

ask them what happens when a guy walks into a women’s restroom and says they’re a trans-man but is lying and isn’t actually trans?

permalink
report
reply

A lot of companies should have sunk in covid and been consumed by more prepared ones.

either way, mass company failure due to covid doesn’t imply anything about the split of china’s economy going forward

permalink
report
parent
reply

it occurs when it’s economically more efficient to move industry out of your country than to keep it in

unless you’re suggesting china will willingly run the bulk of its industry with decreasing efficiency over time for the sake of keeping lower paying jobs domestically

These developments look increasingly structural. The authorities’ stance since 2020, including regulatory tightening and zero-COVID lockdowns, appear to have inflicted long-lasting damage to China’s private economy, the dynamism of which was a defining feature of its economic miracle in the past four decades. Nearly 20 months into China’s COVID reopening, the private sector has yet to bounce back, despite many pro-private business utterances and gestures from China’s leadership.

i’m not sure private businesses failing over covid is a good thing for an economy

permalink
report
parent
reply

“it’s just supplemental” would have initially worked to describe us industry shifting out

investment is finite, so if you have the choice between a and b, investing more money in a is by definition investing in a at the expense of b

permalink
report
parent
reply

highlight the text and click the strikethrough button

permalink
report
parent
reply

TBH, I haven’t used wordpad since Windows 98

which is why they’re getting rid of it

it would probably be pretty easy to just patch telemetry into it, except nobody uses it because why would you

permalink
report
parent
reply