An ex-MAGA activist warns ā€œno civic savior is comingā€ as Donald Trumpā€™s cognitive decline becomes undeniable

What if Donald Trump defeats President Biden and takes control of the White House in 2025? He has already announced his plans to become the countryā€™s first dictator, and to launch a reign of terror and revenge against his so-called enemies. As detailed in documents such as Project 2025, Agenda 47, and elsewhere, the infrastructure is being created right now to put Trumpā€™s neofascist plans to end multiracial pluralistic democracy in effect on ā€œday one." The so-called resistance will not have the courtesy of ramping up or mobilizing to stop Dictator Trumpā€™s onslaught. It will be a ā€œshock and aweā€ campaign visited upon the American people.

Dictator Trumpā€™s reign of terror will be made even worse by the fact that as shown during recent speeches, interviews, and at other events he appears to be encountering severe difficulties in cognition, language, and memory.

In a series of recent conversations with me here at Salon, Dr. John Gartner, a prominent psychologist and contributor to the bestselling book ā€œThe Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President,ā€ has issued this warning: ā€œNot enough people are sounding the alarm, that based on his behavior, and in my opinion, Donald Trump is dangerously demented. In fact, we are seeing the opposite among too many in the news media, the political leaders and among the public. There is also this focus on Bidenā€™s gaffes or other things that are well within the normal limits of aging. By comparison, Trump appears to be showing gross signs of dementia. This is a tale of two brains. Bidenā€™s brain is aging. Trumpā€™s brain is dementing.ā€

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
8 points

Not to mention that the resistance is immensely fractured. Iā€™m still not sure that weā€™ve seen an event heinous enough to galvanize the opposition past ideological boundaries. For many, stopping Trump is not yet enough to delay their potential political gains. Populism rides on the strongest human emotions, the easiest and vaguest enemies, and the simplest (wrong) answers. Itā€™s going to take a united effort, the sort that was brought about by the geopolitical situation in the FDR era, or I worry that we fail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The ā€œresistanceā€ is clustering themselves into smaller and smaller areas and because of our shitty representative apportionment they lose political power when moving to populated places.

If we want to fix this we need to convince people that the amenities in cities arenā€™t going to survive when the federal government mainly represents empty land and thinks those amenities are from Satan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Iā€™m not exactly going to fault persecuted people for fleeing their homes. Itā€™s not always about ā€œamenitiesā€ as much as it is safety and belonging. Iā€™m not against the idea that this dilutes our political power in our system, but Iā€™m also not sure that itā€™s the front Iā€™m going to choose to fight on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Absolutely. There are definitely people who need to leave in order to be safe.

But when I talk to people who donā€™t have that problem about living in flyover country their first response is ā€œThereā€™s nothing to do out there.ā€

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the siteā€™s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. Itā€™s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). Itā€™s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to ā€œMom! Heā€™s bugging me!ā€ and ā€œIā€™m not touching you!ā€ Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Thatā€™s all the rules!

Civic Links

ā€¢ Register To Vote

ā€¢ Citizenship Resource Center

ā€¢ Congressional Awards Program

ā€¢ Federal Government Agencies

ā€¢ Library of Congress Legislative Resources

ā€¢ The White House

ā€¢ U.S. House of Representatives

ā€¢ U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

ā€¢ News

ā€¢ World News

ā€¢ Business News

ā€¢ Political Discussion

ā€¢ Ask Politics

ā€¢ Military News

ā€¢ Global Politics

ā€¢ Moderate Politics

ā€¢ Progressive Politics

ā€¢ UK Politics

ā€¢ Canadian Politics

ā€¢ Australian Politics

ā€¢ New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments