You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

A quick question . Other than a suprisingly lot of complexity involved in diggin the hole of sufficient size and depth why wouldnt it work ( or is that the reason )?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It would work. Much like every other sweeping of something under the rug, hiding it elsewhere for it to be a problem later always works for the person throwing it away.

After all, why would we ever wish to extract the remaining U238 from the spent fuel? We utilised a full 4%, let’s call that square and throw the rest down a hole. Perish the thought we’ll ever need to dig near this massive radioactive hole. Or that an undiscovered cycle of nature causes it to come back to bite us. Just throw it down there with the rest of the resources we never want to safely explore, and who cares if there’s something valuable within it’s sphere of radioactivity.

Apologies for the sarcasm. I consider the idea both wasteful and foolish.

I’m a fan of both Thorium and Molten-Salt Reactors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So a hole with an elevator then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If you like hauling hundreds of tons of waste up and down an elevator? Maybe. Who does maintenance every so often at the bottom of the shaft?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It would work, they’re just a hater.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 288K

    Comments