You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
25 points

The most dangerous part of the journey is still the drive to and from the airport (except for lucky folks like me who have mass transit options).

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Most people have public transit options.

Just some city planners make it faster to go in a personal car. The solution is easy, though. Block of 4 lanes in the highway for busses only. And if theres still more than 4 lanes for cars, block those lanes off for bicycles only.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I know most people do have some options, so I should have specified that mine are particularly good. Cheap, fast, comfy, and easy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, its always an option (ok, only 99% of the time). The difference is how easy it is.

still, most people just make excuses to solve their cognative dissonance. and thats my point: if people actually took the public transport in the places where its annoying, then it would become the most convenient option as they get more funding, more routes, more frequent stops, and dedicated lanes for local and rapid public transport in both directions

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Right, but I’m driving the car and responsible for maintenance. I can mitigate some of the risk, and have insight into the level of risk.

When I get in a plane, I want absolute confidence in the competence of the pilot and crew. I want to know that the plane has been inspected and certified, and the maintenance logged and triple checked.

Finding out that my confidence was misplaced, that the manufacturer has been cutting corners related to safety and structural integrity, that’s a deal breaker for me. An auto manufacturer can regain trust with a new model car that fixes previous defects. Airplanes are in service for decades, and you don’t always know what plane you’ll get until you are at the gate. Airlines will avoid buying new Boeing aircraft, which will drive down the prices, which will encourage further cost-eaving measures at the expense of quality assurance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The more important difference is that the plane cannot pull over in the event of an engine or steering malfunction. Everything needs to continue working for the aircraft to continue its defiance of gravity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not necessarily true. Quite a bit can fail (including engine and steering systems) on a modern aircraft and it will still safely defy gravity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Just wait until you find out what happens in the car industry.

If you think poor safety standards and corner cutting is bad in aviation you’ll cringe when you read up on what happens with car manufacturers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Right, but if my airbag doesn’t deploy or the brakes fail, I don’t get sucked out of the car at 30,000 feet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’re also having to place that confidence in every other person you’re sharing the road with, as well as their dealers and mechanics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Which is the same as a plane. I’m putting my confidence in every other pilot, mechanic, air traffic controller, ground crew, and security. So that’s a wash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I just once want some accountability for a company, is that so much to ask? So it will be Airbus for me, at least until they inevitably fuck us over also.

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 4.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 32K

    Comments