You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
103 points

I think that Biden has done a better job of working the hill to get the stuff he wants than Obama ever did

permalink
report
reply
52 points

Hear hear.

Most underrated President of all time. My expectations weren’t high, but I have to admit, he’s absolutely blown me away with how effective he’s been.

Given the shit he was handed from the previous admin, with a divided Congress, etc. he’s absolutely crushing it. Imagine what he could do with a Congress behind him and a supreme Court that wasn’t broken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

That’s great, but he needs to now self-promote and market himself, or we’ll be stuck with another Trump term (and possibly the end of democracy in America).

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

So your saying a guy who has 40 years of experience in lawmaking is good at lawmaking?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Uh… No? My words were pretty clear, I don’t think they needed to be reframed.

EDIT: I think you meant to reply to the parent comment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It would also help if he stops SUPPORTING THE FUCKING ISRAELI GENOCIDE.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

lol we don’t have a democracy in america.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

We have a democratic republic, a form of representative government. While there is unfortunately a sometimes insurmountable amount of outsized power wielded by the ultrawealthy, we still can make change happen when the opportunity arises. That goes away if the flawed democracy we have goes away.

Don’t let perfection be the enemy of progress. A flawed democracy is better than no democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-83 points

See, I’m almost convinced that it isn’t even Biden. Like, Biden is not a strong leader at all…and I think that’s been a great thing (at least for domestic policy).

It feels like he’s gotten out of the way of the competent people who actually “run the show” in all the myriad departments of government and just let them do their thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

It feels like he’s gotten out of the way of the competent people

Literally the definition of a strong leader, knowing when to step in and when to let the people you hired do their jobs is the hall mark of a good leader

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Teams fill in the gaps. A leader helps direct them where to go and lifts them up as needed.

There are a LOT of managers who need this memo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

I would argue that what you’ve described is a good leader.

To me a strong leader is someone who gets out front of their team and acts as a strong face for their team. That means that the team is getting all the accolades and recognition for their good work, that is keenly running damage control for their mistakes, and that is talking up their team at all points.

I feel Biden is failing as that strong leader.

Unless you’re chronically online, you probably aren’t aware of the recent actions of the NLRB nor of some of the other wins the people Biden appointed over the term of his presidency. He’s not out there blasting some of the absolute W’s his team has gotten, and I think that’s showing in the lackluster polling Biden is getting atm.

The implication of what I’ve said that I want to be clear on: a strong leader isn’t necessarily a good leader, nor is a good leader necessarily a strong leader.

The downvotes I’m getting says the wider community disagrees with this assessment, and in my mind that is what it is. I feel that not recognizing this distinction makes one more inclined to overlook how their voting peers can be swayed towards strong but bad leaders (e.g. Trump) and will thusly make said person less able to influence their voting peers to change their vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

enabling a genocide is a good leader?

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points
*

Yeah, that’s what leadership is, chief.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

And exactly why Trump is terrible at it.

But anyone with half a brain knew that after watching any of The Apprentice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*

Based on what, exactly? Biden is a very experienced politician. And the Republicans have taken their mask off and shown there’s absolutely no point in trying to compromise with them. They only negotiate in bad faith and will reneg on every deal if/when they can.

It took the Dems far too long to accept that you have to fight fire with fire, but they got there.

Obama had a Dem party still valuing bipartisanship and healthy differences of opinions within the party.

Biden has a Dem party that falls in line because they have accepted that they have zero margin for civil discourse, because the Republicans will run away with the country if there’s even the slightest bit of slack.

And so Biden and his administration aren’t pulling their punches. There is no bipartisanship to be had. Only wins where you can take them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Man, the lengths people go to not give Biden any credit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Au contraire Mon ami, I think the community has mistaken what I mean (probably my fault, I didn’t think my original comment through very thoroughly and accept responsibility if I communicated it poorly).

I mean to imy that Biden has made good choices in his appointments, but that his ability to speak and his general lack of charisma are the reason he’s not trumping Trump (pun intended) in the polling for the upcoming election.

I would define Trump as a strong, but bad, leader due to his charisma and ability to take ownership for his people’s actions (even if he takes “liberties” in defining who “his people” are). In my workplace, I would want someone who speaks highly of the actions of me and my team.

I don’t see that from Biden.

As such, I would not describe Biden as a strong leader, but with the caveat that “Good” and “strong” exist on independent axes of the “leadership chart”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That is what I’d call good leading.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 473K

    Comments