You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-10 points
*

Thats not the question, the question is not “can we stop AI entirely” it’s about regulating its development and yes, we can make efforts to do that.

This attitude of “it’s inevitable, can’t do anything about it” is eerily similar logic to what is used in climate denial and other right-wing efforts. It’s a really poor attitude to have, especially about something as consequential as AI.

We have the best opportunity right now to create rules about its uses and development. The answer is not “do nothing” as if it’s some force of nature, as opposed toa tool created by humans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I hear you, and I don’t necessarily disagree with you, I just know that’s not how anything works.

Regulations work for big companies, but there isn’t a big company behind this specific case. And those small-time users have run away and you can’t stop them.

It’s like trying to regulate cameras to not store specific images. Like, I get the sentiment, but sorry, no. It’s not that I would not like that, it’s just not possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

This argument could be applied to anything though. A lot of people get away with myrder, we should still try and do what we can to stop it from happening.

You can’t sit in every car and force people to wear a seatbelt, we still have seatbelt laws and regulations for manufacturers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Physical things are much easier to regulate than software, much less serverless.

We already regulate certain images, and it matters very little.

The bigger payoff will be from educating the public and accepting that we can’t win every war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Dude the amount of open source, untrackable, distributed ai models is off the charts. This isn’t just about the models offered by subscription from the big players.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

This is still one of the weaker arguments. There is a lot of malware out there too, people are still prosecuted when they’re caught developing and distributing it, we don’t just throw up our hands and pretend there’s nothing that can be done.

Like, yeah, some pedophile who also happens to be tech saavy might build his own AI model to make CP, that’s not some self-evident argument against attempting to stop them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

No, like, the tools to do these things are common and readily available. It’s not malware, it’s generalized ai tools, completely embroiled with non image ai work.

Pandora’s box is wide open. All of this work can be done trivially, completely offline with a basic PC. Anyone motivated can be offline and up and running in a weekend

You’re asking to outlaw something like a spreadsheet.

You download a general purpose image ai model, then train and prompt it completely offline

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The models used are not trained on CP. The models weight are distributed freely and anybody can train a LORA on his computer. Its already too late to ban open weight models.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 517K

    Comments