You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-200 points
*

What bothers me most about this is the huge amount of ignorance all sides have on this subject.

The issue IMO, is the fucking AR-15. Police Officers immediately went in when they knew there were problems, but when the subject had an AR-15 that could literally shoot through school walls (ie: Police Officers were outgunned and out-matched), they retreated.

Yes, there was a few hours where they were too scared to do anything, further traumatizing the children / teachers. But this is fucking it. Talk about the firepower and the tactical decision to retreat.

Handguns CANNOT compete against an AR15. The AR15 has superior power, penetration, and accuracy. The officers made the right decision to retreat, regroup, and further come up with a new plan initially. Though their cowardice in the face of the AR15 is what needs to be highlighted most of all.

There’s nothing wrong with being scared of a bigger, more accurate, more powerful gun with more ammunition. If they truly were outgunned, then retreat was the best option (otherwise, officers would have died and that would have forced a retreat while carrying a slain officer around, a much harder task). Shit gets bad to worse in a combat situation if you don’t outgun the opponent.

Dinky handguns won’t do shit against the body armor of the attacker either.


This is literally the case where liberals need to come together, understand the mechanics of the gun involved and push for better gun control laws. If officers in Texas get outgunned and are forced to retreat, then support those officers and push for gun legislation. Everyone knows these bigger guns serve as cop-killers and ultimately fuck our society over. Just quit being dumbass snowflakes about blue-lives-matter or pro-Police stances or whatever.

Being pro-Police here AND anti-gun is the right move in this case. But instead, Liberals fuck over their own politics because they’re too braindead to play their cards right.

Conservatives clearly care more about guns than Police Officers. Punish the Conservative view ya pansies.

permalink
report
reply
112 points

The cops had AR15s, body armor, helmets, flash bang grenades, the works. They also outnumbered the shooter 376 to 1. The shooters vest had no armor plating.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-63 points
*

https://www.texastribune.org/2022/05/27/uvalde-texas-school-shooting-timeline/

Also note: I’m talking about 11:40am. These are the pre-SWAT police officers who rushed into the building almost immediately after the shooter entered the building.

SWAT doesn’t arrive until 12:10pm.

So no. For the time-period between 11:40am to 12:10pm, Police are just armed with whatever they got. Normal officers don’t go around with Flash Bangs, Body Armor, AR15s. Most officers just have a handgun until SWAT arrives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points
*

Standard procedure literally nationwide is that normal officers are expected to go in with what they have. That’s exactly what happened in Nashville less than a year later:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Nashville_school_shooting

The body cam video is public. Officers responded with what they had. Yes, there’s an officer with an AR. There are also officers clearing rooms with handguns and in plainclothes. And one of the officers that engaged the AR-wielding shooter did so with their duty handgun.

Body Armor, AR15s.

They absolutely wear the former every day and many these days have either an AR or a shotgun in the trunk of their patrol vehicle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

May want to read you own article before posting it…from the article at 11:35, a few minutes after the gunman entered the school…

" Three Uvalde police officers rush to the same door that the gunman used to enter, which was closed. Surveillance footage shows the officers all have pistols, and two of them have rifles. One officer has external armor, and two are wearing concealable armor."

They had armor, pistols and 2/3 had rifles.

This is a tragedy any way you slice it. There is so much gun reform that needs to happen, and police did not handle things well here. People with guns are hard situations to handle, but police handled a bad situation on a way that made it worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-68 points
*

Cool.

Now take that highly-penetrative AR15 and shoot it into a school building, knowing full well that the bullets will penetrate the walls and kill the people on the other side of the school.

Even when everyone has an AR15, the shooter still has the advantage, because he had the children hostage. There were also questions on whether the school was clear before any potential shootout (see the problem with AR15’s huge amount of penetration: shooting through the attacker and hitting children in another room is a serious concern still even as SWAT arrives).

Even when you give everyone the works, the problem at play here was the AR15 in the hands of the shooter, which required the police to take a step back and rework tactics entirely.

Thinking from the perspective of the cops side will 100% give yall a ton of evidence and logical arguments to fuck up the pro-gun AR15 lobby. Just think damn it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

.223/5.56 will not penetrate a cinder block wall

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3Gp3hbTmXA

Among the tactical officers who responded were members of the Border Patrol’s elite Bortac team but they couldn’t get into the room because of a steel door and cinder block construction, The Wall Street Journal

Also, most cops carry AR15s or a similar rifle in their cop car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-27 points

You have spoken in a clear, concise, and convincing manner. Well done! You’ve swayed this person.

And you are of course correct in your implication we need to begin design and production of the AR16 posthaste! A gun that shoot through 3 walls is the clear solution. Well done sir!

But in all seriousness you are correct. A nation littered with mentally unstable morons and high-powered rifles is a potently and predictably tragic way to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-48 points

It is outrageous that you are getting downvoted for such a well put together set of comments. Thankyou very much for taking the time. I’m embarrassed for the people who downvote because they know you’re right and they dislike the conclusion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
97 points

If the cops can’t figure out how to suppress and flank one guy they should resign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-84 points
*

Cops aren’t warriors.

There’s another bullshit thing we need to get rid of. Cops are NOT swat team. And the idea of a “Warrior-cop” is one of the worst fucking things in our culture right now.


Liberals have been asking cops to stand down and be more kind for the last decade and suddenly in this case, yall are asking them to be militant warriors again.

No. Leave the “warriors” to the SWAT team at best, and I’m not even convinced that SWAT is a good idea for all cities to have. Warrior-cop mentality is one of the worst things going on in this country right now, and I want to speak against it.

Cops aren’t soldiers. They’re supposed to be community members. In other countries, cops don’t even carry guns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Weird, I want cops to not strangle someone because they may have used a fake bill, or shoot someone because they were called there to help with a mental health crisis, or shoot someone because they busted into the wrong apartment, or to flash bang a baby.

But I suppose that means I want them to be kind to someone actively shooting kids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Nice straw-man, but if they can’t take the heat they shouldn’t be in the kitchen cooking. Uvalde cops went AWOL while children died and you’re defending the AWOL cops against arguments that we’re not making while lumping us all in as flip flopping liberals. Surprised some people know how the government works? They weren’t anywhere close to war and guess what, war is worse. They wouldn’t just stand there, they would run away.

The exact reason why the police refused to engage with the uvalde shooter is precisely because they spend every waking moment fantasizing about being Rambo and then they can’t handle the adrenaline when there’s actual lead in the air. They let the kids catch it all instead. These aren’t men we’re talking about anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They aren’t cops either if they dont have regular training in tactics and law and regulations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Tag: Uvalde Tactical Bystander Specialist

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

This is one of the dumbest takes i have ever read on this site and that is saying something. I really hope you can go through some introspection and have a paradigm shift. Its not easy to change but goddamn. I sincerely hope youre just an ignorant kid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-45 points

The fact that you can’t respond to OPs points speaks volumes. It is fine if you don’t like the conclusion, but you won’t convince anyone of anything if you are unable to form rebuttals to their points.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

The takes are completely dumbass and abhorrent. They shouldn’t get a response.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-46 points

No you.

The gunman enters the school at 11:35am. Pre-SWAT officers charge after the gunman almost immediately afterwards. Initial skirmishes between the Police (with only handguns) immediately show that they were outgunned. Officers ask for SWAT team backup by 11:40am.

Read the fucking report.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-43 points

Sadly, it’s no use. They try to figure out what your conclusion is, and then they shut down entirely and don’t consider why the facts lead to the conclusion. They can’t respond to specifics, all they can do is call names.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*

There is zero reason to be pro-police here.

And who gives a fuck about the weapon used. That does not excuse their lack of action.

Rightists always have such misguided takes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

The people defending the police here are literally saying that the children should fend for themselves in situations like this because it’s too dangerous for the police.

Fuck. That. Noise.

The thin yellow line, everyone. Laugh and point whenever you see the blue stripe on the American flag. It’s a joke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points

Would you rush in to suicide yourself if you knew that it wouldn’t help anything?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Some of the parents whose children were being slaughtered were willing to try while police stood around scrolling Facebook on their phone, but police arrested them for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yes.

I would do something, not sit around worrying about my own arse while children are being killed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-39 points

And who gives a fuck about the weapon used. That does not excuse their lack of action.

Pistols don’t beat AR15 rifles. If the opponent outguns you, you need to wait for backup and bigger guns. Basic tactics.

And if everyone is using big guns during a hostage situation, the “Good Guys” have a huge disadvantage due to the penetrative effects of powerful guns. Good Guys don’t want to kill children with missed (or even hit) shots. A headshot vs the shooter would not only penetrate the shooter’s skull, but also the wall behind the shooter. A wall that you’re not sure if the children or the teachers of the school were hiding behind yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Pistols don’t beat AR15 rifles. If the opponent outguns you, you need to wait for backup and bigger guns.

Why is that? Does the AR15 generate a forcefield around the person wielding it making the shooter immune to any “lesser” weapons? Catching a bullet from a pistol will kill you just the same and this shooter was severely outnumbered. What police lacked was the guts to actually put their lives on the line to protect these children, even though they love to talk about how they put their lives on the line every day as they arrest people for weed or hand out tickets for going 5MPH over the speed limit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Pistols don’t beat AR15 rifles. If the opponent outguns you, you need to wait for backup and bigger guns. Basic tactics.

This doctrine has been out of standard practice for over two decades. In response to Columbine the new mass adopted doctrine is go towards the gun fire. This is information any officer who has joined in the past ~25 years would have been taught.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/15/us/florida-school-shooting-columbine-lessons/index.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

For all anyone cares every body of a child there should have been the body of a cop trying to rush that room.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Guns aren’t Yu-Gi-Oh where the highest attack power wins.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

There’s nothing wrong with being scared of a bigger, more accurate, more powerful gun with more ammunition. If they truly were outgunned, then retreat was the best option (otherwise, officers would have died and that would have forced a retreat while carrying a slain officer around, a much harder task). Shit gets bad to worse in a combat situation if you don’t outgun the opponent.

Go to war? We can’t do that, the other side have guns!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points
*

Soldier/Warrior-cop mentality is fucking toxic bro. I don’t accept it from conservatives, and I certainly don’t accept it from the hypocritical liberals who talk both sides on this issue.

At least the conservatives are consistent with the warrior-cop mentality and do what they believe in.

Go to war?

Cops don’t go to war. In most cases, cops deal with rowdy teenagers or people running naked across school property or other such more typical day-to-day cases. They aren’t (and shouldn’t) be equipped to deal with armed shooters.

Cops who study warrior / soldier mentality become too mean, gain the us-vs-them mentality and fuck shit up. Its one of the biggest problems in our country, and I outright refuse anyone who makes war-analogies to cop situations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

At least the conservatives are consistent with the warrior-cop mentality and do what they believe in.

Looks like my comment flew right over your head if you went ahead and posted this unironically — unless you believe the people, and especially the police, of Uvalde, Texas are bleeding-heart liberals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Cops have been heavily armed since the 90s when they were legitimately outgunned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

TL;DR: ACAB

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

iT wAs JuSt A fEw HoUrS!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Police have all the tools in the world there is no excuse for their lack of action while children are being killed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

No they don’t and Cops shouldn’t have those tools.

I’d be far more comfortable if in these cases of national emergency, the National Guard showed up with actual heavy weapon experience and training. SWAT is a decent compromise (a few units of specialized / highly trained cops). But we should not make the “typical” cop go down the journey towards warrior / soldier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If the typical cop can’t be expected to uphold their duty to protect and serve then they don’t need to be a cop. I do not care if American courts have suddenly decided that the oath and slogan used my police for decades is not binding.

They don’t need bigger or better weapons, they need brains. They had access to cameras in the building. They knew and could have tracked the gunman using those. Set up around two corners near them, team 1 supresses to distract then team two takes out the gunman. Deploying the national guard would take too long, and not all cities have a swat team.

If “typical” cops aren’t expected to risk their safety, then I expect them to take a “typical” paycut. Actually maybe that’s what should happen. Separate real police and law enforcement. Real police get firearms and responsibilities, law enforcement can worry about tickets and fines.

permalink
report
parent
reply

STFU moron.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.56×45mm_NATO#

“There has been much debate of the allegedly poor performance of the bullet on target in regard to stopping power, lethality, and range. Some of this criticism has been used to advocate an intermediate-sized cartridge between the 5.56 and 7.62 NATO sizes.”

The AR15 is typically chambered in .556, a medium sized cartridge typically pretty lacking in stopping power especially when compared to other popular firearms like the M1 Garand chambered in 30-06 much actually does penetrate much further that .556

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 502K

    Comments