Source

I see Googleā€™s deal with Reddit is going just greatā€¦

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

Is this a dig at gen alpha/z?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I guess it would have to be be default, since only older millennials and up can remember a time before internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

not everyone is a westerner you know

my village didnā€™t get any kind of internet, even dialup until like 2009, i remember pre-internet and i still donā€™t have mortgage

e: now that iā€™m thinking ADSL was a thing for maybe a year or two, but it was expensive and never really caught on. the first real internet experienceā„¢ was delivered by a sketchy point to point radiolink that dropped every time it rained. much later it was all replaced by FTTH paid for by EU money

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

heh yeah

I had a pretty weird arc. I got to experience internet really early (ā€˜93~94), and it took until ā€˜99+ for me to have my first ā€œregularā€ access (was 56k on airtime-equiv landline). it took until ā€˜06 before I finally had a reliable recurrent connection

I remember seeing mentions (and downloads for) eggdrops years before I had any idea of what they were for/could do

(and here I am building ISPs and shitā€¦.)

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lies. Internet at first was just some mystical place accessed by expensive service. So even if it already existed it wasnā€™t full of twitter fake news etc as we know it. At most you had a peer to peer chat service and some weird class forum made by that one class nerd up until like 2006

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

never been to the usenet, i see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

reading your post gave me multiple kinds of whiplash

are you, like, aware of the fact that there can be different ways experiences? for other people? that didnā€™t match whatever you went through?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Haha. Not specifically.

Itā€™s more a comment on how hard it is to separate truth from fiction. Adding glue to pizza is obviously dumb to any normal human. Sometimes the obviously dumb answer is actually the correct one though. Semmelweisā€™s contemporaries lambasted him for his stupid and obviously nonsensical claims about doctors contaminating pregnant women with ā€œcadaveric particlesā€ after performing autopsies.

Those were experts in the field and they were unable to guess the correctness of the claim. Why would we expect normal people or AIs to do better?

There may be a time when we can reasonably have such an expectation. I donā€™t think it will happen before we can give AIs training thatā€™s as good as, or better, than what we give the most educated humans. Reading all of Reddit, doesnā€™t even come close to that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Hereā€™s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless itā€™s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 558

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments

Community moderators