You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
55 points

To add to this, A lot of gorillas that are saved from unsafe/illegal conditions cannot go back into the wild. Places like The Rotterdam zoo provides a lot of enrichment for these animals that you won’t see at say, Joe’s roadside animal park.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why not save animals from unsafe/illegal conditions and provide enrichment, without turning the animals into an attraction?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Because the attraction rallies support for preserving and protecting their natural habitat. Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

But they aren’t necessary for conservation. Conservation can occur without zoos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Because people wouldn’t support spending their taxes on it without making them aware of the value. Which is done by educating them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

That doesn’t answer my question.

permalink
report
parent
reply

interestingasfuck

!interestingasfuck@lemm.ee

Create post

Community stats

  • 1.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 61

    Posts

  • 831

    Comments

Community moderators