You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

Why not save animals from unsafe/illegal conditions and provide enrichment, without turning the animals into an attraction?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Because the attraction rallies support for preserving and protecting their natural habitat. Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

But they aren’t necessary for conservation. Conservation can occur without zoos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yes, but conservation is not a binary condition. Zoos are responsible for more conservation than we would otherwise have without them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

i too can come up with technically true statements that are completely useless

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I love when people like you suddenly come up with a hot take that absolutely no one has ever thought through ever in the past hundreds of years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Because people wouldn’t support spending their taxes on it without making them aware of the value. Which is done by educating them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

That doesn’t answer my question.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No one can answer the question of a sealion.

permalink
report
parent
reply

interestingasfuck

!interestingasfuck@lemm.ee

Create post

Community stats

  • 863

    Monthly active users

  • 112

    Posts

  • 1.6K

    Comments