The world’s first human trial of a drug that can regenerate teeth will begin in a few months, less than a year on from news of its success in animals. This paves the way for the medicine to be commercially available as early as 2030.

The trial, which will take place at Kyoto University Hospital from September to August 2025, will treat 30 males aged 30-64 who are missing at least one molar. The intravenous treatment will be tested for its efficacy on human dentition, after it successfully grew new teeth in ferret and mouse models with no significant side effects.

“We want to do something to help those who are suffering from tooth loss or absence,” said lead researcher Katsu Takahashi, head of dentistry and oral surgery at Kitano Hospital. “While there has been no treatment to date providing a permanent cure, we feel that people’s expectations for tooth growth are high.”

Following this 11-month first stage, the researchers will then trial the drug on patients aged 2-7 who are missing at least four teeth due to congenital tooth deficiency, which is estimated to affect 1% of people. The team is recruiting for this Phase IIa trial now.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
44 points

Insurance will probably call this cosmetic and not cover it.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Something like this seems cheap and longterm enough to be included in an insurance. Maybe not immediately, but soon enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

God damn - every single post about something good is just filled with sad sacks that have to find something negative to focus on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Healthcare is a huge sore spot in US culture right now. There’s been too much high-level corruption and greed to have faith in any change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Nice of you to just disregard the real suffering that a shitty healthcare and insurance system creates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Sigh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Well unfortunately we are all products of our environments, where every single beneficial discovery inevitably becomes a commercial endeavour and priced out of reach of the societies that could benefit most from them. You are entitled to be the cheerleader for the discoverers to your hearts content, just as we are allowed to see and react to the after effects of it

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Do you disagree with what they actually said though?

Maybe everyone focuses on the negatives because we just did 5 straight years where it seems like if given the choice between two outcomes positive and negative, we’re living in the timeline where the negative thing always happens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My point is that some bizarre monoculture has developed where people seem to be pathologically unable to accept that something good happened for a change, and to focus on the good thing. Virtually every comment finds some way to find some ultra-pessimistic take. The very best possible take is nearly always something like “wtf took them so long” or “OK, now do X”.

It should be okay - occasionally - to be happy that something good happened. We have the 98% of other posts out there to moan about and focus on the negative stuff.

It was bad on Reddit, but it seems even worse here.

It’s exhausting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You should expect every post to have a variety of opinions. Some positive, some negative. Not everybody is going to react to posts the same way you do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

The vast majority of replies in this thread, and to nearly every positive post - are sadsackery.

Differing opinions is fine. Raw, pointless pessimism as a monoculture is…not what you’re describing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments