You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

I’m not sure what you’re saying. The size of the labour force and the way salary “growth” relates to employer movement rate seem to me relatively independent dynamics. Moreover, I’d imagine increased layoffs positively correlate with the advantage that regularly moving employers can provide.

Am I missing something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Some of the companies that pay the most are the same ones doing the layoffs, like Google.

Trading up for money could add extra risk exposure to layoffs.

But if every job change is seen as a pay raise opportunity, I guess layoffs are speeding the process along for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

AFAICT, lay-offs are pretty widespread. Sometimes the bigger employers just give the smaller ones “permission” first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I haven’t heard of any smaller companies in my network doing layoffs, but I’m sure there are some out there.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Work Reform

!workreform@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

  • All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
  • Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
  • Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
  • We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

  • Higher wages for underpaid workers.
  • Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
  • Better and fewer working hours.
  • Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
  • Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 951

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments