cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/22739710

Archive/mirror: https://archive.ph/59Vg5

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
64 points

Isn’t that like banning someone for having a beer at a country concert?

permalink
report
reply
6 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Alcohol doesn’t impact the people around you until you drink it and become a drunk asshole.

Submitting other people to unwanted 2nd hand smoke is a dick move no matter what it is.

It’s not about what the drug does it’s about how it’s consumed. If weed is legal there I bet he’d be allowed edibles.

THAT SAID ITS A FUCKING PHISH CONCERT, isn’t a bong part of the ticket?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Would he have been banned if he lit up a cigarette? Probably not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Years of acceptance and you can’t get a contact buzz from being around drinkers. Also the scent of a beer doesn’t carry as far as weed. I agree it’s dumb if one is legal for a venue then both should be.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

!weirdnews@real.lemmy.fan

Create post

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like “Watch:” or “Look:” can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline’s intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you’ve got nothing positive to say, don’t say it.

Violators will be banned at mod’s discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally…

Community stats

  • 2.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 714

    Posts

  • 4.2K

    Comments