cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/22739710
Archive/mirror: https://archive.ph/59Vg5
Isn’t that like banning someone for having a beer at a country concert?
Alcohol doesn’t impact the people around you until you drink it and become a drunk asshole.
Submitting other people to unwanted 2nd hand smoke is a dick move no matter what it is.
It’s not about what the drug does it’s about how it’s consumed. If weed is legal there I bet he’d be allowed edibles.
THAT SAID ITS A FUCKING PHISH CONCERT, isn’t a bong part of the ticket?
He did it back in April…
If someone complained about second hand smoke or whatever, ok fair enough.
But to ban someone months after the fact, meaning nobody who was at the event complained, is BS
How did he get a bong past security? Lol
