Paywall removed: https://archive.is/MbQYG

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
61 points

SIKE! sold houses are only bought by corporate holding companies, now you’ve lost even more rights!

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

In France there is a law that forces you to sell to your tenant if he has the highest bid

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Why would you need a law to make someone sell to the highest bidder?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Because sometimes there’s a tie

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s even better than that because it is illegal to make bids on a property you sell so the seller name a price and if someone want to buy it at that price it’s sold. Most of the time buyers tries to bargain on markets where the demand is low

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This happened a lot during the Great Depression. But then I believe the owners found a way to withdraw the auctioned property if the minimum bid didn’t suit them. The French law might bring back the Penny Auction by saying, “You put it up for bid - a sale has to go through.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They can still do that through proxy buyers. If you go to enough auctions, it’s easy enough to pick them out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Wouldn’t you sell to the highest bidder anyway?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I mean, my wife and I didn’t sell to the two highest bidders on our first house because the fuckers were obviously going to rent it out.

One was a bid entered by a piece of software often used by flippers and rental companies (had branding at the bottom of the pages etc) and the other was a cash in hand bid with an overt offer of more under the table, which is fairly illegal where we live.

We selected third place, someone who had messy handwriting, obviously has been written by two different people, and ended the bid with “777” which was cute and showed us not only were they human, they really wanted the place. And no wonder, with offers like the first two likely happening on nearly every sale in the area.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Wouldn’t most people sell to the highest bid anyway?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Never any history of racial segregation in the housing market, nope. No Sir. Never.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There have been auctions in the past, mostly farm, that the community got together to drive off outsiders and then proceed to lowball every item on the auction. They would then return everything to the owner after the auction.

It was a fine ‘fuck you’ to the bank, until the bank closed or sold out because they no longer had the assets and cash reserves needed to stay open themselves. Which then screwed the rest of the community over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes but we had our fair share of assholes

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

More precisely, when you sell the tenant has the right to buy it first.

If the landlord is thinking of accepting an external offer under the initial price then he has to ask again to the tenant if he would buy it at this lower price.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Umm, you can legally sell it to someone else and not the highest bidder?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Not in France. If the tenant wants it, the tenant gets it

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Idk, something like 12% of all metro Atlanta area homes are leased out by about 3 rental property companies. That’s a huge amount.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 409K

    Comments