You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
43 points
*

Big tech companies making vast profits off of users providing data for free instead of paying workers wages in exchange for manufacturing goods is only going to deepen the disparity of wealth in society.

What we desperately need is essentially a Digital Bill of Rights so that we can legally own our own data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

you’d have to rally everyone against the most profitable businesses right now for this to happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

you mean theres no infinite growth and eventually it would lead to overextracting wealth from the people? just preposterous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s almost as if you could look at countries containing 1/6 of the world’s population and see where all of this is going.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The solution for capitalism is more capitalism? Have you never played monopoly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Private ownership ≠ capitalism. Monopoly is a critique of free market capitalism, which naturally leads to a concentration of wealth for those who hold all the assets. Giving people ownership of their own data would help redistribute that wealth in a more equitable way.

No, it won’t fix the underlying problem of Capitalism, but it would at least be a step in the right direction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Private ownership ≠ capitalism.

Right. It’s private ownership of capital; aka the means of production. You’re saying that data should be owned because it can be used productively. That’s exactly capitalism for capitalism’s sake.

This is a typical economically right-wing approach. There is a problem, so you just create a new kind of property and call it done. The magic of the market takes care of it, or something. I don’t understand why one would expect a different result from trying the same thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

You already own everything by default unless you forfeit your rights by implicitly accepting terms and conditions of a specific service.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

So basically don’t interact with 99% of online platforms, then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yes. Seriously stop giving them free content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Yes. That’s the whole point of them: you give away your information and most of your rights. Even if it’s something like Lemmy, open source, free, no ads, etc, you’re still forfeiting your rights. Because otherwise you cannot share anything publicly. Only private and inaccessible platforms can protect your rights. For example, a private Telegram channel protected by a password and with forced E2E encryption might protect your rights (I’m not sure about Telegram ToS, so I’m not 100% sure), but public platforms - never. They’re public, that’s the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply

memes

!memes@lemmy.world

Create post

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.3K

    Posts

  • 102K

    Comments