You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
2 points

I’m guessing it’s called that because it’s kinda headphone shaped. It was discovered in the 30’s so I’m assuming only the brightest parts of the nebula were visible to the astronomers.

This image is a combination of false color narrowband images for the nebula itself, plus true color RGB stars (the nebula is mostly red and a little blue in true color). If you zoom in to the center you can see the very blue white dwarf that caused the planetary nebula to form. Also for those curious this is what a single 10 minute long Ha exposure looks like (image total is 83.5 hours exposure). Captured over 33 nights from Jan-May 2024 from a bortle 9 zone.

Places where I host my other images:

Flickr | Instagram


Equipment:

  • TPO 6" F/4 Imaging Newtonian

  • Orion Sirius EQ-G

  • ZWO ASI1600MM-Pro

  • Skywatcher Quattro Coma Corrector

  • ZWO EFW 8x1.25"/31mm

  • Astronomik LRGB+CLS Filters- 31mm

  • Astrodon 31mm Ha 5nm, Oiii 3nm, Sii 5nm

  • Agena 50mm Deluxe Straight-Through Guide Scope

  • ZWO ASI-290mc for guiding

  • Moonlite Autofocuser

Acquisition: 83 hours 30 minutes (Camera at -15°C), NB exposures at unity gain and BB at half unity

  • Ha - 238x600"

  • Oiii - 247x600"

  • R - 54x60"

  • G - 53x60"

  • B - 54x60"

  • Darks- 30

  • Flats- 30 per filter

Capture Software:

  • Captured using N.I.N.A. and PHD2 for guiding and dithering.

PixInsight Preprocessing:

  • BatchPreProcessing

  • StarAlignment

  • Blink

  • ImageIntegration per channel

  • DrizzleIntegration (2x, Var β=1.5)

  • Dynamic Crop

  • DynamicBackgroundExtraction 3x

duplicated each image and removed stars via StarXterminator. Ran DBE with a shitload of points to generate background model. model subtracted from original pic using the following PixelMath (math courtesy of /u/jimmythechicken1)

$T * med(model) / model

Narrowband Linear:

  • Blur and NoiseXTerminator

  • StarXterminator to completely remove stars (to be later replaced by the RGB ones)

  • ArcsinhStretch to slightly stretch nonlinear

  • iHDR 2.0 script (low preset) to stretch each channel the rest of the way.

here’s the link to the repo if you want to add it to your own PI install.

RGB Linear:

  • ChannelCombination to combine monochrome R G and B frame into color image

  • SpectroPhotometricColorCalibration

  • BlurXTerminator for star sharpening (correct only)

  • HSV Repair

  • StarXterminator to generate a stars-only image

  • ArcsinhStretch + HT to stretch nonlinear (to be combined with starless narrowband image later)

  • Invert > SCNR > invert to remove magentas

  • Curves to saturate the stars a bit more

Nonlinear:

  • PixelMath to combine stretched Ha and Oiii images into color image (/u/dreamsplease’s palette)

R = iif(Ha > .15, Ha, (Ha*.8)+(Oiii*.2))

G = iif(Ha > 0.5, 1-(1-Oiii)*(1-(Ha-0.5)), Oiii *(Ha+0.5))

B = iif(Oiii > .1, Oiii, (Ha*.3)+(Oiii*.2))

  • NoiseX again

  • Background Neutralization

  • Shitloads of Curve Transformations to adjust lightness, hues, contrast, saturation, etc

  • even more curves

  • Pixelmath to add in the stretched RGB stars only image from earlier

This basically re-linearizes the two images, adds them together, and then stretches them back to before. More info on it here)

mtf(.005,

mtf(.995,Stars)+

mtf(.995,Starless))

  • Couple final curves

  • Resample to 65%

  • DynamicCrop

  • Annotation

permalink
report
reply

Astrophotography

!astrophotography@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to !astrophotography!

We are Lemmy’s dedicated astrophotography community!

If you want to see or post pictures of space taken by amateurs using amateur level equipment, this is the place for you!

If you want to learn more about taking astro photos, check out our wiki or our discord!

Please read the rules before you post! It is your responsibility to be aware of current rules. Failure to be aware of current rules may result in your post being removed without warning at moderator discretion.

Rules

  • I | Real space images only.
  • Astrophotography refers to images of astronomical objects or phenomena exclusively.

  • Images that show objects or people below the Kármán Line (100km) will be removed. We won’t be enforcing this rule for now, but as the community grows eventually we will split and have a separate space for just landscape astro.

  • Images must be an accurate representation of a real astronomical object.

  • See this page for more details


  • II | Original and Amateur Content Only
  • Image posts can only be images that you have captured and processed yourself, or discussion about capturing and/or processing your own images.

  • Images acquired from public sources, professional observatories, or other professional services are not allowed.

  • If you have done a drastic alteration or reprocessing of a prior submission, you may repost your edit - but only after a minimum of one week has passed.


  • III | Post Types
  • Image posts are to link directly to the image, not to landing pages, personal galleries, blogs, or professional sites. Link to these in the comments. (AstroBin and Imgur, are allowed)

  • Questions are welcome here for the time being.

  • Links to blogs, articles or external websites should be interesting and promote discussion about amateur astrophotography.


  • IV | Titles
  • All image posts should just include include the name of the object being photographed. Extra info such as equipment, it being your first image, or other information should go in a comment along with your acquisition info. Please see this page for more details.

If your post is removed, try reposting with a different title. Don’t hesitate to message the mods if you still have questions!


  • V | Acquisition and Processing Information
  • All submitted images must include acquisition and processing details as a top-level comment. All posts without this information may be given a warning, and if not updated will be removed.

  • This includes the telescope, mount, camera, accessories, and any other pieces of equipment you used to capture the image.

  • You must also include processing details, i.e. the programs you used and a general rundown of the workflow/processes you used within those programs. “Processed in Photoshop” is not enough.

Community stats

  • 150

    Monthly active users

  • 126

    Posts

  • 351

    Comments