You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments 207 points
What a terrible decision. That’s like saying if you have a house key they can search your house.
47 points
There’s a reason they keep you focused on the first two amendments. Don’t want you realizing how comfortable they are with unregulated search and seizure.
Honestly idk how the civil forfeiture can possibly be considered constitutional
9 points
4 points
2 points
10 points
*
8 points
7 points
His attorney probably should have raised that objection in the first place. He should have objected based on the phone not being material to the search of the car. But if he didn’t raise the objection correctly during the initial trial, then he can’t raise the objection on the appeal either.