cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5031268
We vote for the person we can negotiate with
Roe v Wade is dead. Homelessness is criminalized. The rail union was crushed. Funding for nazis and zionists remains a top priority. Biden bragged about finally beating medicare and called Trump his colleague. Wages remain low while unchecked nationwide price gouging and collusion have caused the cost of living to skyrocket. Landlords are continuing to gobble up housing and steal from tenants with the full support of the capitalist legal system.
Contrary to blue maga belief, negotiating doesn’t mean preemptively surrending and letting the other side do whatever they want with your full support.
We vote for the person we can negotiate with.
Legitimately, how do we negotiate with biden and what concessions do you think we can win?
not like that example where tens of millions died during the transition. No, not that other example either.
What examples are you talking about?
Go back to needless infighting until you’re irrelevant again.
There are explicit rules against infighting, I really don’t see much here. Every now and again I’ll see someone say anarchists don’t have a plan.
Its wild that instead of responding to anyone you made an entire seperate comment to attempt to lecture with no push back. Instead of coming off as the sole genius amung us rubes you instead look deeply unserious.
Don’t you hate it when people from other instances parachute in and refuse to argue in good faith?
I don’t give a shit about whatever seething rage your projecting onto me. I called you out for being a cowardly loser. Argue in good faith, argue in bad faith, just actually argue if your going to pretend to be so smart everyone should strongly care about what you have to say.
What are they yapping about
Edit: if you think Donald Trump is that bad and that Joe Biden is answerable to the public, then maybe Joe Biden should just kill Donald Trump. Maybe if Joe Biden doesn’t even feel that strongly about opposing him, they might not be that different.
You want him to win, accelerating things towards total social collapse so a communist utopia can successfully rise like it did in other places?
If accelerationism were reliable this would be very funny ngl. Given that Biden is a walking corpse with gravy for a brain though, he’s probably the accelerationist candidate now
Biden is hot off heavily implying he wants war with China, is that what you mean? Also while Trump is far from being a spring chicken, and is something of a genocide supporter himself, he at least hasn’t called himself a black woman this week.
Also you realise that this isn’t some trick question, and I’m not advocating voting for one or the other, right?
One of the two old guys with gravy brains is actively calling for war with one superpower
Imagine thinking trump is the only one trying to pivit to Asia.
and to let the other superpower conquer Eastern Europe. So.
Oh no! The Russians have infiltrated the New York times specifically to make you look silly.
Non-Credible Defense isn’t sending its best. You seriously malded in wait for 8 months just to come back like this?
It’s completely allowed to both think Biden is the best pick while objectively knowing that he is controlled opposition. The system deserves to be mocked, and I’ll do it while voting for Sleepy Joe.
Why do you feel the need to defend this broken system with so much energy?
I like that you’re clowning this nerd, but I gotta ask - why give your vote to the guy that stamps his approval on billions sent to help zionists commit genocide?
Someone close to me works for the federal government. He is administrative staff supporting government ecologists, and they’re fearing a Trump presidency. Project 2025 will destroy our national parks and ruin years of ecological research, at minimum.
Both candidates will send money in support of genocide. One candidate will dismantle our federal systems (the good ones people forget about) and kill trans kids.
I can’t in good conscience pretend both old men are equally harmful.
