You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
36 points
*

Because those votes are mainly votes against Trump and even a trash can would probably pull in similar protest votes. All the more reason the idea of a better candidate that people are even slightly more enthusiastic over could push those numbers up

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yep. I’m voting against Trump, not for Biden. Trump could run against a rock for all I care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Therein lies the rub. There aren’t any democrats that poll better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No other democrat is campaigning though…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

True. However, national exposure is a large factor and even if there was someone vetted, they still will walk unintroduced on the national stage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

There aren’t any democrats that poll better

Factually untrue.

This has Biden down 6 points. And Kamala only down 2.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/02/politics/cnn-poll-post-debate/index.html

But your comparing Biden as “the candidate” with the DNC and millions of dollars of campaign against people that haven’t even said they’re willing to run…

Obviously anyone else that becomes the candidate would see a significant boost to their numbers both short and long term.

But others also are polling closer (better) than Biden…

Several other Democrats have been mentioned as potential Biden replacements in recent days, and each trails Trump among registered voters, with their levels of support similar to Biden’s, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom (48% Trump to 43% Newsom), Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg (47% Trump to 43% Buttigieg), and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (47% Trump to 42% Whitmer).

That’s 4 people polling better than Biden in the last couple days…

Weird you haven’t seen it yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You realize the Venn diagram of “Candidates the DNC financiers support” and “Candidates that would get more support than Joe Biden” doesn’t actually overlap, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If campaign financing is the primary consideration then we deserve the shit storm that’s coming.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

The press constantly talks about the so-called “money primary.” No Dem has ever objected to such phrasing.

The money primary is the actual primary in our system of governance.

We the plebs only get to pick one of the pre-selected billionaire champions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah.

The vast majority willing to vote for Biden, would vote “blue no matter who”.

Which means logically, switching candidates is the smartest plan if all that matters is stopping trump.

But a very small, very vocal group of Biden voters (and even Biden) seem to be lying about what’s most important. I still can’t believe Biden really said he wouldn’t care if he lost.

If they can’t get Biden. A Republican is their second pick.

They just won’t admit it.

But it’s the only logical reason people would be insisting it has to be Biden. Just like Joe, they don’t care if trump wins.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Personally i think they’re just as scared as we are. They’re just too fucking old to have a realistic picture of the political landscape. Gen X is going to get us all killed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Bruh, gen X isn’t in charge of shit…

You know Biden and a lot of party leaders are still the generation ahead of Baby Boomers, right?

The youngest boomers are 60, how many party leaders calling the shots are significantly under 60?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Any candidate but Harris would not have access to the money already raised.

Historically, the candidate who raises the most money wins (ignoring 2016).

Meaning the only option the democrats have is to put Harris at the top of the ticket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What the fuck are you talking about? You just decided to lie like that? That’s wild

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 331K

    Comments