I’m going to say what everyone is thinking but too afraid to admit: Battle Royale games are the epitome of lazy game design.

They rely on the same tired formula and add nothing new to the gaming landscape. These games are just cash grabs, feeding off the hype, and they’ll be forgotten in a few years.

We need real innovation in gaming, not just a hundred-player deathmatch with a shrinking map. Change my mind.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

Dynamic gameplay? It’s a glorified hide-and-seek with guns. Just because something is popular doesn’t mean it’s good. Remember fidget spinners?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Comparing Battle Royale to fidget spinners is ridiculous. These games have depth, skill ceilings, and require teamwork. It’s not just mindless shooting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Depth and skill ceilings? More like RNG and luck. You can be the best player and still lose because someone found better loot. That’s not skill, that’s chance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s about adapting to the situation and using what you have. The unpredictability adds excitement. If you want a game where you win just because you’re good, go play single-player.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Video Game Arguments

!vga@hilariouschaos.com

Create post

The harsh truth you can’t handle about video games.

Community stats

  • 2

    Monthly active users

  • 14

    Posts

  • 168

    Comments

Community moderators