You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
71 points

Dan Quayle must be happy to pass that “worst VP ever” torch on to someone else.

permalink
report
reply
77 points

i miss the days when the fuckup someone is remembered for was misspelling potato

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Those were simpler times. Now it’s the Time of Simps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Slow clap

Well done!

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Putting an e on the end of potato basically ended his political career and now Trump supporters shout “covfefe” because they think it’s somehow smart. I think about that a lot.

Or the fact that people largely see the photo that Dukakis took in a tank as the moment HW Bush won the 88 election - compared to Trump’s photo op in a Fire Truck…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Or when Howard Dean “ruined” his political career by whooping at a rally because it “wasn’t presidential.”

Our expectations are so low right now that putting together two cogent sentences could literally mean that you win the election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

The 90s: “How could we ever put someone in charge who’s so stupid he can’t even spell potato?”

George W. Bush: “Watch this drive”

Donald J. Trump: “unintelligible gibberish”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I would argue they were just better at hiding the same type of shit these modern politicians are thinking and saying. Now it’s just acceptable. Then you had Howard Dean dooming himself for a cowboy scream.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Worst is subjective. I’d argue that Cheney’s support of blood for oil and Halliburton rebuild scheme was far worse than anything Quayle did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah, same thought. Cheney was the worst because he was smart, competent, and evil. That beats incompetent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Agreed. Despite Vance’s inability to please a crowd, he’s more on the “Cheney dangerous” side of the spectrum than “Quayle dumb.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Simpler times. He gave us these nuggets of wisdom:

  • “You take the UNCF model that what a waste it is to lose one’s mind or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true that is”
  • “The Holocaust was an obscene period in our nation’s history. … No, not our nation’s, but in World War II. I mean, we all lived in this century. I didn’t live in this century, but in this century’s history”
  • “I have made good judgments in the past. I have made good judgments in the future”
  • “I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and democracy, but that could change”
  • “potatoe” (when trying to “correct” a 12-yr old’s spelling of “potato”)
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

At least Dan Quayle convinced Pence not to play ball with Trump’s schemes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Everyone loves a redemption arc. But how sad is it that the ‘potatoe’ guy was the voice of reason who helped save American democracy in it’s darkest hour (so far!). We really are living through Idiocracy!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Dan Quayle was on the phone with Mike Pence on January 6th.

We probably owe our republic to Dan Quayle.

I’m just saying, I wouldn’t take points off a kid for writing ‘Potatoe’. Not after that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

it only counts if he’s elected

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 416K

    Comments