Google’s campaign against ad blockers across its services just got more aggressive. According to a report by PC World, the company has made some alterations to its extension support on Google Chrome.

Google Chrome recently changed its extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the new Manifest V3 framework. The browser policy changes will impact one of the most popular adblockers (arguably), uBlock Origin.

The transition to the Manifest V3 framework means extensions like uBlock Origin can’t use remotely hosted code. According to Google, it “presents security risks by allowing unreviewed code to be executed in extensions.” The new policy changes will only allow an extension to execute JavaScript as part of its package.

Over 30 million Google Chrome users use uBlock Origin, but the tool will be automatically disabled soon via an update. Google will let users enable the feature via the settings for a limited period before it’s completely scrapped. From this point, users will be forced to switch to another browser or choose another ad blocker.

Archive link

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
67 points

I‘m really anxious for firefox as google is the main financier afaik.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

It is a worry. I think we might end up needing to pay for Firefox ourselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I will happily donate.
If, of course, money won’t go to the CEO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

it is lol, have you seen how much the ceo is paying herself?

its kind of a reddit situaton, where money wouldnt be that much of an issue if it werent all for the ceo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

A CEO is a needed possition, I know in the past the Brendan Eich was controversial in his political views, but Laura Chambers seems ok so far

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Not sure firefox will be on our side after the recent ad tracking debacle. If they implement one more anti consumer feature I‘m jumping ship.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Jump ship to what? Not like there’s s lot of choices out there. You could always try LibreWolf.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

look up ladybird. we may soon have a 3rd browser!

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Looks promising. Lets see where it goes. https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s hard to take a project seriously for championing our privacy if the only communication options are Discord & Microsoft Github

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I am hopeful they will get some more corporate backing. We can donate all day but that is a drop in the bucket compared to a few million from some large companies

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

using a novel engine based on web standards.

Now, that’s a name I haven’t heard in a long time…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

In 2026

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

That’s supoosed to be the preview release date on Linux and MacOS…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

2026 isn’t soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

IIRC, only like 2% of Mozilla spending goes towards FF (I may be misinterpreting something, but I remember 2% being thrown around), so funding FF without rest of Mozilla bullshit shouldn’t be that hard. Of course, since Mozilla did spend so little on FF, it’s a question how much they actually care about FF and what would happen if they lost access to their golden goose. They shouldn’t have problem funding FF, but they probably have other bullshit they don’t want to let go and that has more priority for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

A list of Mozilla’s “other bullshit”:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Mozilla_products

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You are right, it was unfairly harsh wording, I apologize for that. Most of those products are super cool and important, I’ve kind of extrapolated it from what I’ve read in other posts about them spending too much on stuff like events and other, non-developemnt, related stuff that I actually never checked, while also not realizing that they also have a ton of other projects, which mixed with the dissapointment with the recent development about the Meta partnership led to me choosing that wording unfairly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

For now. They could default to yahoo and make money. Maybe not as much, but they could sustain browser development.

Firefox is still far superior to chromium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I agree. That could work. We‘ll see.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Privacy

!privacy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Community stats

  • 4.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 78K

    Comments