You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
92 points

you know what I always stan for? “former Twitter”. I just love that shit! I hope it always stays like this to show that the rebranding didn’T work

permalink
report
reply
56 points

I’ve been thinking we need to get aspirational and take it to the next level:

Instead of “X (formally know as Twitter)”, the time has come for “Twitter (currently called X)”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Don’t even acknowledge the current name of the site, just keep calling it Twitter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

“Trending on Occupied Twitter”

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

just call it twitter. literally everyone knows what it is, and twitter.com still redirects there so who gives a shit what he’s calling it. don’t show his site the courtesy he doesn’t show to his own daughter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

He literally still called the posts tweets so…

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’m just sad we aren’t at calling it “formerly facebook” instead of meta

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I’m not a fan of the company, but at least this one has a handful of different platforms underneath it - Oculus, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Facebook. Having Facebook the product and Facebook the overarching company kind of ads a little complication.

I don’t quite feel the same way about Alphabet/Google, but at least that’s more subtle.

X can fuck the duck right off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Poor duck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, same as Alphabet. Neither of these renamed their key product either. Just put a new company on top.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I still call it Facebook. Meta is equally stupid as X. Meta as a word already existed in multiple different ways. Now if you say ‘that’s meta’ you have to stop and think, which may be why I’ve seen that phrase really die out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The meta rebranding is not as evil as the hostile takeover of Twitter. So I am inclined to accept that name change but I do not know really what using meta means.

I don’t use FB, if I did I would still say FB. I use WhatsApp and I don’t call that meta. I guess the individual products just keep their names here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

There is also the difference that Facebook the service is still called Facebook. Only the company name changed, but not the product name. Where for Twitter, he renamed both the product and the company.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I just don’t call it anything. I avoid anything related to Facebook or Meta.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

X is simply too vague.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 554K

    Comments