Comment by TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world on Google pulls the plug on uBlock Origin, leaving over 30 million Chrome users susceptible to intrusive ads

I did link to his blog… It’s stallman.org

I said from there you can go to the dates I provided.

I don’t wish to be rude, but do you really need this hand-holding? It took me less than 10 seconds to find a specific link to the first quote, for example:

https://stallman.org/archives/2003-mar-jun.html

Did you really look?

Stallman being pro-paedophila is not new information.

You pasted the domain not an actual blog post link. And you’re the one making these claims about him on a forum, does it really surprise you when someone asks for the source? Sorry you had to google something.

I’m sorry I hurt your feelings. But I’ll take that downvote and no reply as a “yes, you were right. Stallman is a disgusting supporter of child rape and bestiality”.

Perhaps you can learn from this. Celebrity worship is bad. It blinds you to the faults of people. Stallman doesn’t deserve your simping.

You calmed down? You agree he supports paedophilia, yes? The evidence is right there. I provided sources for you a bunch of times.

You were the one looking for proof? Then you do the googling.

That is how this shit works, genius.

This makes no sense. This person made a claim and I asked what the source was. Shouldn’t they know where their own comment came from?

Mike, you came at this person twice. He gave you a url and since you’re on Lemmy we assume you’re at least halfway internat savvy.

In my shoes I’d have at least put in a few minutes of effort to look for the information on that site. Or even a general search. ANYTHING to evince my capability for critical thought.

You were given 99% more than most are in this type of exchange and still lazily demanded more. You didn’t just ask and you weren’t all that polite. I found it lazy. That you appear to feel a keen need to have the last word in this type of situation is also worth a bit of reflection.

You’ve got the burden of proof backwards, pal.

Lucky this isn’t a court of law, buddy.

Online discussions aren’t formal debates, bud.

I gave a link to the source, his blog, and gave instructions on how to find each statement. I even gave timestamps.

I gave you the source as soon as you asked. The source is Stallman’s blog, stallman.org.

Apology accepted, don’t worry about it. You just came across as a bit of a sealion, that’s all.

Anyway, the point is, yes, Stallman has been a repeated defender of paedophilia and having sex with family pets.

Personally for me that’s a mark against him. But that’s just my opinion, a lot of people in the Linux don’t really mind.

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Google pulls the plug on uBlock Origin, leaving over 30 million Chrome users susceptible to intrusive ads(www.windowscentral.com)

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Our Rules

Approved Bots

Community stats

Community moderators