Fox News did not air a second of the speeches from alienated GOP leaders and former Trump officials who endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris at this week’s Democratic National Convention.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
3 points

I got kicked out from Radio, Television, and Film school for poor grades, poor attendance, and a number of other poor choices, so I really don’t know what I’m talking about when I ask this question:

Doesn’t that violate the Equal Time Rule?

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Doesn’t that violate the Equal Time Rule?

not at all, nor should that rule even exist. It’s always been a bunch of bullshit pushed by conservatives to normalize their positions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But without fairness and balance, how are the masses supposed to think unpopular ideas have significant support???

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

According to this FCC fact sheet:

Equal opportunities and other political-related benefits are available only to individuals who have attained the status of “legally qualified candidate.” These rules do not apply to cable channels or web-based video or audio such as streamed video content, podcasts, or social media.

And since Fox News is a cable channel, it does not apply

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m almost positive that Fox isn’t cable… It’s broadcast and carried by cable companies because they’re required to do so by the FCC

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think you’re (reasonably) confusing Fox and Fox News.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Probably not, since they did cover a presidential candidate and other speakers are not the ones running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No. The Equal Time Rule is about stations providing equal airtime access to candidates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Equal airtime for all candidates or just democrats and Republicans?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Mostly the latter, as the two capitalist parties jealously guard their duopoly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Would you agree that it doesn’t break the letter of the law but it skirts the spirit of the law? Like, if they aired the RNC in its entirity but selectively skipped parts of the DNC…

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The spirit of the law doesn’t mean anything. The law itself barely even means anything given how it’s enforced. I’m not exactly seeing equal access for third party candidates. This is just the ruling class negotiating via the two parties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sure, that is their MO though

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 4.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 32K

    Comments