The administration of US President Joe Biden refuses to transfer long-range ATACMS missiles to Ukraine, despite requests from Kyiv and pressure from US lawmakers.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
11 points

I’m guessing the US arsenal of ATACMS missiles is rather limited and they have their own reasons for not making it smaller, which they can’t go into detail about. Frustrating, but understandable.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

IMO it’s also about not looking like the boss of NATO – a lot of tankies in Europe like to complain that they’re just puppets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The best theory I have seen is the Biden administration is trying to ‘manage’ the conflict. A belief they can dictate levels of aid to determine a geo politically satisfactory outcome.

Concerns around unmanaged escalation made sense but the UK has been pretty focussed on methodically moving up the escalation ladder to demonstrate Russia won’t resort to nuclear strikes (Brimstone, Challenger 2 tanks, setting up the F16 coalition, Storm Shadow, etc…).

The USA expects China to be the next conflict zone, that is a naval/air situation where ATACM’s can’t be used. Suffering a shortage of ATACM’s in the near term isn’t really an issue especially if you’ve already put in place contracts to address the gap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

PrSM isn’t ready yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m convinced this is the real reason they haven’t been sent yet

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ukraine

!ukraine@sopuli.xyz

Create post

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine’s Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


Community stats

  • 3.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.4K

    Posts

  • 28K

    Comments