Comment by MyOpinion@lemm.ee on OpenAI Pleads That It Can’t Make Money Without Using Copyrighted Materials for Free

Then it sounds like your business is a failure and should be shutdown.

WHO is the one guy who downvotes you???

“NO! UNPROFITABLE BUSINESSES DESERVE TO THRIVE!!! MUST FEED THE BILLIONAIRES!!!”

Maybe OpenAI learned to downvote…

I’ve seen threads where every single comment, no matter how anodyne, has 1 downvote. Don’t bother yourself over it. That way lies madness.

Downvoting for the use of an uncommon word.

Supercalifragalisticexpialidocuious

Edit: 10 people here didn’t grow up with Mary Poppins…

You spelled it wrong you brick.

You could even say his spelling is quite atrocious

Lmao the down votes on this are really funny to me

Just imagine baron bomburst and the child catcher furiously downvoting this comment lol

What I get a kick out of is the down and upvotes mean basically nothing and yet people still get super sensitive about them. They only move your comment up or down the thread. It’s not like reddit where there is a karma count for all your posts and comments. Hell you don’t even get auto hidden like the way reddit would do. You just get downvoted.

Some people downvote to show disapproval. Others downvote if the comment doesn’t add to the conversation. Still others are just trolling. No one should worry about the downvotes.

Sound was quite atrocious, downvoted 👎

I think people are missing the joke here 😄

anodyne

anodyne /ăn′ə-dīn″/ adjective

Capable of soothing or eliminating pain.
Relaxing. “anodyne novels about country life.”
Serving to assuage pain; soothing.

tanks fer noo werd dae fren

First read serving sausage pain.

That sounds like a misusage of a very common word in French: anodin

I’d say a good 10% of English is just misusing words from other languages to be fair.

It’s also really easy to mis-swipe on a comment on some apps.

Some people also suck

I always figure it’s someone whose life has become so pathetic, they bitterly downvote every single comment to try feel some control. And as a result, they feel like the Phantom of the Socials. Alone, but the true master of the place.

“Everyone must wonder, ‘Who keeps downvoting us?’ It is I! The true Master of Lemmy and- No, mother!.. Yes, mother!.. I tried but nobody wants to talk to me!.. I don’t want to!.. Yeah, she’s cute!.. I don’t want you to do that!.. Mother put the phone down!”

LOL, I can picture this person. They probably have a gross-looking bandaid on their downvote finger.

There are some hardcore “copyright shouldn’t exist” folks out there.

The guy who wants their AI girlfriend yesterday.

WHO is the one guy who downvotes you???

That’s the bot that ChatGPT operates here on Lemmy.

Ask an mbin user lol

I’m unclear on context. Are you saying Mbin users can see who upvotes/downvotes?

Votes aren’t private on the fediverse, it’s just a that some interfaces won’t display them. Also, instance admins can see who voted too.

But like @Boozilla@lemmy.world said

Don’t bother yourself over it. That way lies madness.

It mainly useful for admins to detect if there is some vote manipulation going on.

Sam Altman lurking around…

To steel man the downvoters, maybe there are other solutions besides killing off every business that can’t afford to comply with copyright. After all, isn’t the whole point of copyright to enable the capitalist exploitation of information?

Lol how about every pirate who fundamentally opposes the copyright system?

How about everyone who uses Google and doesn’t want to see it shut down for scraping copyrighted content to provide a search engine?

Seriously, explain to me what’s different at a fundamental level about OpenAI scraping the web and transforming the data through an LLM and Google scraping the web and transforming the data through their algorithms (which include LLMs)?

Google (used to) scrapes the specific details authorized by robots.txt and uses it to make your content visible.

OpenAI scrapes everything it can technically see, ignoring robots.txt and feeds i to a black box and regurgitates it claiming it’s something new, that it deserves to be paid for.

Quite different actually.

So if OpenAI complies with Robots.txt files then there’s no issue right?

Because then they’re identical. Open AI spent a bunch of money building a powerful system they feed those results to, as did Google.

No, the issue is that anything AI creates is by definition derivative. Google doesn’t whip up generative content, it points you to content.

OpenAI is claiming that they can’t do shit without scraping copyrighted works and we all know that’s a load of BS because we’re adrift in a sea of royalty-free text. Critical mass happened well over a decade ago. The amount of new random crap hosted on the internet in the past 30 days would probably take 500 years for one person to digest. Bear at a stream watching an impossibly large amount of salmon jumping

Actually Google tries their hardest NOT to point you to content. They scrape the data from sites and display it directly in the search results so that you don’t need to visit any site except Google. Their new AI answers that they are pushing on users are just another step in that direction.

Literally every page Google shows you, where it also shows you those ads it makes money from, is Google’s content and it is derived from the data it gets scraping the web.

Web search used to be about scraping the web to find and present other people’s work as just that… their work. Now the handful of websites claim ownership of the contributions of everyone, and at this point it’s just corporations arguing about who owns your stuff. Pirates will not win out in this argument, except maybe in the very short term.

Search engines provide source, they scrap for indexing, but your search gives a list of websites that matches that you will then likely visit. That’s a big fundamental difference.

Google doesn’t sell the search engine as a product.

Yes they do, just indirectly, it’s how they monopolized the online advertising business.

I dont see why why being downvoted you make some very good points.

Id actually like to see google shut down on copyright grounds. The innovation of necessity would drive foss search alternatives that just ignore said restrictions and most likly we would end up with a better product.

I appreciate the defense of the blind downvotes, though I can’t say I necessarily see how Foss search engines would even be allowed to exist in that case?

There is a difference between allowed and what people do. Piracy isnt allowed u can still pirate literally anything if u want to tho.

You’d probably end up back with AI at that point. A lot easier to distribute a trained model then an entire web index.

If not, The Pirate Bay would like a word.

I’d love to see how scared some big companies would be if we could decriminalize piracy

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

OpenAI Pleads That It Can’t Make Money Without Using Copyrighted Materials for Free(futurism.com)

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Our Rules

Approved Bots

Community stats

Community moderators