You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
22 points

Because products sold as non-psychoactive should generally actually be non-psychoactive. Though personally I appreciate it from the perspective of I’d like to be able to eat hemp protein without failing a drug test.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I feel you on that, but drug tests are bullshit anyway. Unless a test can reliably tell that you’re under the influence at work, they shouldn’t be able to use them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

I mean, agreed, but I’m working for the DOT so… Not a lot I can do about that at least until it gets rescheduled. Hopefully if it gets rescheduled people can get a federally acknowledged prescription and the ADA should take care of the rest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If it were just about protecting the public, they would require a label of ingredients, which most items already have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The… The ingredient is hemp, it’s one ingredient.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But aren’t we talking trace amounts?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No. Only ∆9 is limited. Per the farm bill, thca is hemp, so the same stuff you would buy at a dispensary can be legally purchased online and shipped to all but a handful of states. It’s all about the money.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Trees

!trees@lemmy.world

Create post

A community centered around cannabis.

In the spirit of making Trees a welcoming and uplifting place for everyone, please follow our Commandments.

  1. Be Cool.
  2. I’m not kidding. Be nice to each other.
  3. Avoid low-effort posts

Community stats

  • 852

    Monthly active users

  • 522

    Posts

  • 4.9K

    Comments