You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
42 points

What’s up with the message to start with? How is he making the world better by investing in crypto

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Imagine you have a simplified understanding of our financial system. Not necessarily wrong, but you are more on the “Money can be exchanged for goods & services”-level of understanding, then to a true finance expert, like an economist or market analyst for example.

You read into our financial system a little bit more and you discover that there are some real issues with it. People are making money off of it, but are not really contributing to society. But you are not quite there yet to understand that the reason for these flaws are complex & multilayered.

You discover crypto & the promise of a currency free of these backroom figures that syphon off money. A promise of redistribution to the common man.

Now mix in a little bit of narcissistic tendencies. YOU ARE A COMMON MAN. The big redistribution hasn’t happened yet, you can be Robin Hood destroying these man in black suits (& take a relatively minor part for yourself). You will be rich and the good guy.

At the end of the day this is an ad. Ads don’t have to be true. They have to invoke the right feelings in there target audience. And the target audience here is people with mediocre understanding of the financial world, with a few narcissistic tendencies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

“A true finance expert… like an economist” 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You discover crypto & the promise of a currency free of these backroom figures that syphon off money. A promise of redistribution to the common man.

you listen to the pitch of a conman

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

then to a true finance expert, like an economist or market analyst for example.

I think you meant “than”. “More of X than X”. “Then” would be “I’m going to do this then that”

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

He and his other cronies declared their plan was to accumulate a tonne of money and give it all away to charities. They called it effective altruism which we now know was total BS

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“Well, I get to be a huge fucking asshole all I want, because if I, at some point in the future, spend all my money building the AI supergod it will save all of potential humanity, doing more good than anything ever before!”

“But, can’t you do that AND feed hungry babies?”

“No, the AI supergod requires a second golden airplane!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Well, a bunch of ernest and thoughtful philosophers called it effective altruism (see Toby Ord, will mccaskill, Peter singer). Then it was adopted by the deluded arrogant tech/finance bros and yeah yikes. Sucks to be a philosopher I guess. Someone uses your ideas fraudulently and boom, they’re your problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Anyone that spends more time philosophizing about doing good than doing good isn’t worth listening to.

Peter Singer, btw, Mr Effective Altruism himself, wanted to genocide disabled infants. Not abort them as fetuses. Infanticide them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Because that sounds like what you want to hear, and if I say it, you will give me your money.

permalink
report
parent
reply

NoSafetySmokingFirst

!nosafetysmokingfirst@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Welcome to NoSafetySmokingFirst!

For images where the text reads correctly left to right, but visual cues (like colouration, vertical proximity, or horizontal separation) lead you to try to read it top to bottom.

This is similar to, but distinct from, the more widely known “DontDeadOpenInside” format. In that case, the text reads correctly top to bottom, but visual cues (like colouration, horizontal proximity, or vertical separation) lead you to try to read it left to right.

The post that started it all:

NO | SMOKING
SAFETY | FIRST

Other related communities:

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 20

    Posts

  • 117

    Comments