If I’m scanning groceries for somebody else then sure but if it’s just my own stuff, it’s not work. Take pumping gas, some locations do it for you but if I’m pumping it myself, I’m not doing work for fre.
You’re performing labor vital to the store’s goal of selling you shit. Either someone else does that labor and gets paid for it, or you’re doing that labor for free. Doing it “for yourself” doesn’t make it not-labor and pushing the labor costs onto you are literally the entire point of these things from the business’s viewpoint. You’re choosing not to be bothered by it.
Just curious, how do you feel about ATMs for banking instead of the tellar? Although I agree labor is labor, freeing up a task for a cashier/grocery worker so they can focus on something else is a win. If I see a grocery cart far from the return stack, I’ll move it. That’s somebody’s job, but I don’t see it as free labor.
Maybe, but this principle feels still reactionary in this case, depending on your presented solution. For now, we are more progressive towards our communist goals and better off with the self-checkout. It is a more centralized and efficient option in general. The problem isn’t the fact that we are doing work for free that someone else should be paid for, it’s that we should socialize the results of that free work in dropping prices and investing that labour elsewhere. Otherwise we’re just re-privatizing the half of a process that’s closer to socialization.
I don’t think I’m necessarily complaining about your position here, you could just be using this phrase and agreeing, but I often see this phrasing followed by the reactionary “we can finally have normal lines and clerks like we used to have”. Giving them that job back now (in full amounts, like before self-checkout lowered the amount) just results in even lower pay for those people and decreases every other benefit from it. There’s never a going back in these cases which won’t result in much worse things and further from a workable position strategically…
