You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
9 points
*

I’m a fan of the Capitalist Realist Shopping Cart Theory, myself.

Putting shopping carts away is bad for society and you should stop doing it.

The reason is that putting a shopping cart away requires labor, labor requires a person to do it, and the person who has to do it is employed by the grocery store.

Thus, if enough people refuse to put their shopping carts back, enough excess labor will be generated at grocery stores around the country that they will be forced to hire more people to do it, creating jobs.

QED

permalink
report
reply
9 points

But is creating those jobs actually something we want? How much does someone get paid for collecting carts? How much does that increase prices for basic necessities? Do we have a labor surplus such that any job is a good job?

The answer to all of those is “no.” I don’t know about you, but I’d much rather keep my office job than go collect carts, so I put my cart away so the person would would have that job can get a better job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

So my personal take on shopping cart theory is that it assumes putting away shopping carts is not a fun job.

I have worked at whole foods for 2 years, and the thing I hated the most was how it felt like Bezos’s watchful eye was always on you. The supervisors could be super persnickety about your breaks. Compared to my new life as a self employed musician, it was like prison, but that’s retail for ya.

I personally loved cart duty. It was a time when I could go outside, get some fresh air, and not be under the surveillance of that god awful company*.

So now if it is a nice day out, I will go out of my way to put the cart in left field. I call it a chaotic good move.

That said the “it keeps jobs” is BS. If cart duty wasn’t a thing, the person would still be filling baskets and cleaning windows.

*Note: the Halstead location in Chicago was actually really great. Maybe it was the Stockholm syndrome of working retail during pandemic, maybe it was Midwestern kindness, but that team actually seemed to care about each other’s wellbeing and we’d even hang out. I lean towards Midwestern kindness though, I moved here from Seattle and while I miss the mountains, I CERTAINLY do not miss the social scene. Despite what the news tries to tell you, Chicago takes care of its own. Even when I was a stranger in a strange land, and then homeless during polar vortex, the people took me in. Every. Night.

Not sure if I’d visit, but I’d definitely live here.

Sorry for the Chicago tangent, I’m a few handshakes deep and I get emotional about this fuckin’ place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The problem isn’t that it’s not a fun job. It’s that the pay is shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So I should do it for free because the store isn’t willing to pay their employees?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is just “littering is fine because it’s someone’s job to pick it up” with extra steps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Littering has environmental impact, and looks bad. Carts being put back by the company or the customer doesn’t hurt the environment. If it looks bad the company creates a job to ensure the customer keeps coming.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You can’t reason with these cart extremists because the only thing they actually care about is their car not being dented by a cart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The cart carrier’s job will still be there regardless. I take my cart to the stall, they take it to the store, and nobody has to deal with loose carts. My social responsibility is not impacting anyone’s job in this case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

something something glaziers fallacy.

Obviously this is a joke, but if it even sounded remotely plausible to anyone reading fix yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

glaziers fallacy

TIL a new fallacy. I was joking just for the record, I called it “capitalist realist” specifically to try and indicate that it’s the kind of thing you might believe only if you were extremely economics brained.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

yeah I figured you were, but it seemed like some people were actually engaging with it. As if make-work somehow made the line go up.

There’s a fun joke:

2 economists are out walking. The first economist sees a pile of dog shit and says to the other, “I’ll pay you $50 to eat that dog shit.” So he does and gets paid $50. Later on, the second economist sees a pile of dog shit and says to the first, “I’ll pay you $50 to eat that pile of dog shit.” So he does and gets paid $50.

The first economist says, “I can’t help but feel we just ate dog shit for nothing.” “Nonsense,” says the second economist, “We just contributed $100 to the economy.”

Of course actual economists aren’t this terrible, but the popular perception of economics/monetary theory is about this braindead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You can’t think of a job more productive than cleaning up after lazy cunts?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Jean-Baptiste Emmanuel Zorg everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This is why I dig ditches. I create labour because someone has to pay to fill them in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Show us one example literally anywhere that actually did that. Philosophy is not an excuse for being a lazy jerk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

(this is a facetious post, making fun of economists who sometimes push damaging and anti social theories based on sketchy market-based logic)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

We should hire someone to wipe our arses for us too!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That used to be a thing, lmao.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Bubbles joined the chat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean they still gotta put em up after that so…

permalink
report
parent
reply

Greentext

!greentext@sh.itjust.works

Create post

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

  • Anon is often crazy.
  • Anon is often depressed.
  • Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Community stats

  • 8.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 867

    Posts

  • 34K

    Comments