Isn’t it supposed to be “fewer” anyway?
They probably mean that those convenient areas adjacent to the lanes on a road should be seen as “less bike lanes, but more car park”.
No, less is perfectly acceptable. GoT is very annoying for turning people into grammar pedants for a 18th century style suggestion.
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let’s explore the bad world of Cars!
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
Don’t discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
Don’t follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don’t doxx any non-public figures.
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
4.5K
Monthly active users
937
Posts
25K
Comments
