You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

If it were free but buses and trains showed up 1/3 as often it’s not worth it.

I think free fare advocates aren’t advocating for this hypothetical tradeoff, it’s probably for increased funding to replace fare revenue

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I guess. To clarify, if I also had to choose between maintaining existing service levels but free or prioritizing service expansion with an equivalent amount of funding I would also opt for the latter, except in cases where the cost of collecting the fare outpaces the benefits (like traffic data as I mentioned) or revenue recovery from it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

British Columbia

!britishcolumbia@lemmy.ca

Create post

News, highlights and more relating to this great province!

Community stats

  • 665

    Monthly active users

  • 2.1K

    Posts

  • 4.2K

    Comments