You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
54 points
*

I mean, I like to think Sony made it perfectly clear this time around. There’s really no excuse this time. People were warning other people, Sony had it on the system requirements sheet, and Steam had it listed as soon as the page went up. So if you still picked up the game and then decided to bitch about the PlayStation Network requirement because you didn’t know, that’s on you.

Flipside, if you bought the game just to bitch about the PlayStation network requirement, knowing full well this would be a requirement, you’re way more privileged than me. When I don’t like how someone does something, I typically don’t give them money unless I don’t have a choice.

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I did this too much and got a message from steam. I think the refund feature is not intended for testing any game and getting money back. :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I think the refund feature is not intended for testing any game and getting money back.

This is the first sentence from the Steam Refunds Policy page: https://store.steampowered.com/steam_refunds

You can request a refund for nearly any purchase on Steam—for any reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

This is my exact reaction. The issue with HD2 was the bait and switch of adding the requirement at a later date, particularly since they had already sold copies in places where people literally could not make PSN accounts.

Not that I agree with Sony’s decision to require the account for GOW, but at least they’re being up front about it this time. If you don’t want the account, there are 500 billion other quality games you can buy that don’t require one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Technically yes, but they didn’t actually require it in the beginning and they even sold it in regions without PSN.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Could be people who already have the PSN account. Linking it was never the problem. I don’t want the account

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

It was also perfectly clear the first time, the CEO of Arrowhead chose to not make the information as readily available as HE should have. Sonys always had the same stance, but one CEO decided to try and stick it to them, and unfortunately, it worked, but they likely won’t get more work.

He chose to turn the requirement off to fix a glitch on their system. It was a requirement, it was listed, Arrowhead is wholefully to blame

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Who gives a shit. Arrowhead made a good game. Fuck Sony. No one wants your dumbass PSN account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

They also willfully broke their contract obligations, the game was only made because of the investment by Sony as well. So they took their money and gave them the middle finger and got their fan bases to bash Sony when it was their doing. But sure make fun of an account I guess?

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

Honestly I appreciate them buying it and expressing the disappointment in Steam reviews. It is the best way to get attention to it since people aren’t going to refrain from buying it. Boycotts don’t work so people expressing their thoughts is the best we got.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

“boycotts don’t work” lmao

The gaming community is incapable of executing an effective boycott because they cannot go 5 minutes without the thing they like. So they’ll pre-order garbage, never learn their lesson, and complain the whole time while paying a premium, instead of exercising restraint and playing something else - like one of their 4,000 unplayed games in their bought library.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

RuneScape would like a word with you

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The gaming community is incapable of executing an effective boycott

If that’s the case, then explain exactly why Sony backed off of the account requirement for Helldivers 2

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If people don’t refrain from buying then boycotts won’t work. Gaming community is more effective at creating noise than not buying a product they want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Boycotts only work when the group boycotting is large enough to impact the bottom line.

Most gamers just don’t care enough about accounts and launchers to boycott a game or company. They just want to come home from work and play games.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Yeah, they left off the rest of that lesson, which is “boycotts don’t work if you don’t fucking do them”. Boycotts work when they happen, and it’s still a good thing to personally boycott a game you feel isn’t up to your standards even if the broader community isn’t, but it’s been consistently shown nonetheless that gamers are horrible at wide-scale boycotts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Steam refunds are easy and convenient. I wouldn’t personally bother doing that just to post a “protest review” either, but it’s definitely possible to do without losing any money.

permalink
report
parent
reply

PC Gaming

!pcgaming@lemmy.ca

Create post

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

Community stats

  • 5.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.2K

    Posts

  • 25K

    Comments